It's been 8 years almost to the day that my grandmother passed away. Five years ago I forgot what she sounded like. And there are still things I wish I could tell her.
tell this person your thoughts feelings etc they are all around you and can still hear you.
Add a comment
You must be a member to comment.
Categories
Your account当前位置：
＞＞＞— How are you today? — Oh, I ____ as ill as I do now for a ..
&— How are you today?&& — Oh, I ____ as ill as I do now for a long time.&&&&
A. isn't feeling&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&B. wasn't feeling&& C. don't feel&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&D. haven't felt
题型：单选题难度：中档来源：同步题
马上分享给同学
据魔方格专家权威分析，试题“— How are you today? — Oh, I ____ as ill as I do now for a ..”主要考查你对&&现在完成时&&等考点的理解。关于这些考点的“档案”如下：
现在没空？点击收藏，以后再看。
因为篇幅有限，只列出部分考点，详细请访问。
现在完成时
现在完成时的概念：　　
现在完成时用来表示之前已发生或完成的动作或状态，其结果的影响现在还存在；也可表示持续到现在的动作或状态。其构成：have（has）+过去分词。现在完成时共有四种主要用法： 　　
一、现在完成时表示影响：该用法的现在完成时表示一个过去发生的动作在过去已经完成，并且这个过去发生并完成的动作对现在有影响或结果，同时说话者强调的或感兴趣的就是这个影响或结果，如汉语说“他已离开这个城市了”，其中的“离开”肯定发生了，它对现在的影响或结果就是“他现在已不在这个城市了”；又如汉语说“有人把窗户打破了”，显然“打破窗户”这一动作发生在过去，并且在过去已经完成了，但说话人强调的重点是打破窗户对现在的影响—窗户现在仍是破的。如：He has left the city. 他已离开这个城市。（结果：他不在这个城市。） 　　&&&&&&& Someone has broken the window. 有人把窗户打破了。（结果：窗户仍破着。） 　　&&&&&&& I have lost my pen. 我把钢笔丢了。（结果：我现在无钢笔用。） 　　&&&&&&& He has finished his work. 他把工作做完了。（结果：他现在可以做其他的事了。） 　　二、现在完成时表示持续： 　　该用法的现在完成时表示一个过去发生的动作或开始的状语在过去并未完成或结束，而是一直持续到现在，并且有可能继续下去（也可能到此结束），如汉语说“他在我们学校教书已有30年了”，显然“他在我们学校教书”是从30年前开始，并且一直教到现在，已经持续了30年；又如汉语说“自上个星期以来他一直很忙”，显然“忙”是从上个星期开始的，并且这一“忙”就一直忙到现在。如：He has taught in our school for 30years. 他在我们学校教书已有30年了。 　　&&&&&&& He has been busy since last week. 自上个星期以来他一直很忙。 　　&&&&&&& He has worked for us ever since he left school. 他离开学校以后就一直为我们工作。 　　三、现在完成时表示重复： 　　即表示从过去某个时间直到现在的这个时间范围内不断重复发生的动作或情况，并且这个不断重复的动作有可能继续下去，也有可能到现在就结束。如：How often have you seen her? 你隔多少见她一次? 　　&&&&&&& My father has always gone to work by bike. 我父亲一向骑车上班。 　　四、现在完成时表示将来： 　　同一般现在时可以表示将来一样，现在完成时也可以在时间状语从句里表示将来。如：I'll wait until he has written his letter. 我愿等到他把信写完。 　　&&&&&&& When you have rested, I'll show you the garden. 等你休息好之后，我领你看我们的花园。 现在完成时知识体系：
&比较一般过去时与现在完成时：
1）一般过去时表示过去某时发生的动作或单纯叙述过去的事情，强调动作；现在完成时为过去发生的，强调过去的事情对现在的影响，强调的是影响。 2）一般过去时常与具体的时间状语连用，而现在完成时通常与模糊的时间状语连用，或无时间状语。一般过去时的时间状语：yesterday, last week，…ago, in1980, in October, just now等，皆为具体的时间状语。现在完成时的时间状语：for, since, sofar, ever, never, just, yet, till/until, up to now, in past years,always等，皆不确定的时间状语。共同的时间状语：this morning, tonight, this April, now, already, recently, lately等。 3）现在完成时可表示持续到现在的动作或状态，动词一般是延续性的，如live, teach, learn, work, study, know。一般过去时常用的非持续性动词有come, go, leave, start, die, finish, become, get married等。例如：I saw this film yesterday.（强调看的动作发生过了） &&&&&&&&&&& I have seen this film.（强调对现在的影响，电影的内容已经知道了） &&&&&&&&&&& Why did you get up so early?（强调起床的动作已发生过了） &&&&&&&&&&& Who hasn't handed in his paper?（强调有卷子未交，疑为不公平竞争） &&&&&&&&&&& He has been in the League for three years.（在团内的状态可延续） &&&&&&&&&&& He has been a League member for three years.（是团员的状态可持续）　　句子中如有过去时的时间副词（如yesterday, last, week, in1960）时，不能使用现在完成时，要用过去时。（错）Tom has written a letter to his parents last night. （对）Tom wrote a letter to his parents last night.
发现相似题
与“— How are you today? — Oh, I ____ as ill as I do now for a ..”考查相似的试题有：
169077168962449459195880242357170182当前位置： &
求翻译：Susan is absent from today’s class. — ________ As far as I know, she has never missed a class.是什么意思？
Susan is absent from today’s class. — ________ As far as I know, she has never missed a class.
问题补充：
苏珊是缺席从今天的课。— — ________ 就我所知，她永远不会遗漏了一类。
苏珊·没有出席今天的类别。 ----《据我所知,她从来没有错过一个类别。
苏珊是缺席今天类。 - ________，只要我知道，她从未错过类。
苏珊是缺席从今天的课。— — ________ 就我所知，她永远不会遗漏了一类。
苏珊是缺席从今天的课。— — ________ 就我所知，她永远不会遗漏了一类。
我来回答：
参考资料：
* 验证码：
登录后回答可以获得积分奖励，并可以查看和管理所有的回答。 |
我要翻译和提问
请输入您需要翻译的文本！The full story...
Germany expels top US intelligence official over spying row
Jane Cowan reported this story on
TANYA NOLAN: Germany has expelled America's top intelligence official in Berlin after revelations of a second suspected US spy in a matter of days.One man inside the German foreign intelligence agency has been arrested on suspicion of passing secret documents to the Americans, and now another official is under investigation, this time inside the German defence ministry.Jonathan Laurence is a professor of political science at Boston College specialising in European politics, and a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution.He spoke to North America correspondent Jane Cowan.JONATHAN LAURENCE: I wouldn't classify this as surveillance per se, it's pretty old fashioned espionage. It doesn't raise any of the civil liberties issues that the NSA (National Security Agency) vacuuming does or that even the tapping of Angela Merkel's cell phone did.This is old-fashioned, cloak and dagger, turning employees of ministries that have been going on for a millennia.The Americans were caught. This gives the Germans the upper hand. It also allows them for once to have that upper hand and show that they can do something about the perceived American arrogance and they're not complexly off their rockers either to view this as arrogance, if only because it comes in the wake of the very sensitive discussions over the NSA and Merkel telephone scandals.JANE COWAN: The Germans say that this amounts to a breach of confidence and that now cooperation between the two countries needs a reset. How damaging is this to the US-German relationship?JONATHAN LAURENCE: I think that they do have to play this up for a domestic audience. Again, its genuine indignation, its genuine outrage, but it's also one of the few cases where they can genuinely do something about it.I don't think that this will change the ultimately shared security interests on the borders of the European Union visa vie the members, the candidate states for the European Union or the candidate states for NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization).Germany and the US will continue to see slightly differently on those subjects but remain broadly committed to containing Vladimir Putin. If anything goes on transatlantic trade and investment where the US and Germany have every reason to cooperate and make some difficult compromises for the greater good but also for their own national economies which stand to benefit from that.The American military has been tasked for over half a century obviously with helping protect the West German and then Federal German Republic from external threats. This sort of spying activity is part of that apparatus so there's an understanding I believe in Berlin that if you want to have the benefit of the American security umbrella, there are going to be exaggerations or overflows at certain point where you're not happy with it.And they're not happy with it and they have every right to object and you know, we have ourselves imprisoned or expelled spies from other countries so it is fairly routine. It also offer the chance not to reset but kind of bury this and turn the page back to where it should be, which is facing in other rather serious security threats in the Middle East and in eastern Ukraine.JANE COWAN: So you don't foresee any serious fallout and you don't foresee that America will change its ways? JONATHAN LAURENCE: I believe where America needs to change its ways that is more in terms of the mass surveillance and to reconsider how it vacuums up information from the internet. You know, what the best balance of liberty and security is there, but in terms of everyday low level spying like this, the United States doesn't need it.They could say that it's because they turned off the microphones or whatever that they're using, human intelligence now and so the Germans should be happy but the reality is that the Americans don't need to do this. They could simply ask the Germans what their positions are on these topics and they'd get a very straightforward answer because the German and American relationship is fundamentally excellent.This makes it harder for Merkel and Obama to make nice on the international stage but, you know, she came for a state visit where he was able to apologise to her for the telephone scandal and she enjoyed American hospitality and the relationship was rejuvenated, even in the absence of a no-spy agreement. So since the US doesn't give no-spy agreements to anyone even its closest allies, Germany among them, there can be no ultimate guarantee that this won't happen again but I think that the US is just out, you know, interests of protecting German leaders from appearing completely helpless or powerless against American arrogance, Americans are likely to withdraw these sorts of low level activities for fear of causing further dispute.TANYA NOLAN: Jonathan Laurence is a Professor of political science at Boston College. He was speaking there with our North America correspondent Jane Cowan.
From the Archives
The beginnings of civil war: Sri Lanka in 1983
Recent Programs
Follow us...
Subscribe to our
Other News Websites
0) location.href = this[this.selectedIndex].">
Program Websites
& - Asia Pacific
& - Background Briefing
& - Go Asia Pacific
& - NewsRadio
& - Sunday Profile
& - Asia Pacific Focus
& - Australian Story
& - Behind The News
& - Foreign Correspondent
& - Four Corners
& - Inside Business
& - Insiders
& - ABC Investigations
& - Landline
& - Lateline
& - Lateline Business
& - Offsiders