大学体验英语上机听力答案5级全(新)_百度文库
两大类热门资源免费畅读
续费一年阅读会员，立省24元！
大学体验英语上机听力答案5级全(新)
上传于||暂无简介
阅读已结束，如果下载本文需要使用0下载券
想免费下载更多文档？
下载文档到电脑，查找使用更方便
还剩22页未读，继续阅读
你可能喜欢I Believe In You (You Believe In Me) 歌词_百度知道
I Believe In You (You Believe In Me) 歌词
提问者采纳
s easier for me to believe in you and nothing lessI believe /song/8739901" target="_blank">http://music, the reason that I needThrough the fire and through the rainI know your love for me will never ever changeJust because I need no one to prove your loveIt&#39, the reason that I needIt help myselfYou&#39, heals a wounded heartAnd it&#39;s so clear to see your hand in everythingYou were there for meThere to see me throughI believe in you can&#39,Just because I don&#39.s how it is when it comes to youYour mercy has no endYou&#39:Johnnie Taylor专辑歌曲名;re all the hope://s easier for me to believe in youYou are so beautifulYou are the miracle t help myselfTo believe in youby lune<a href="t help myselfYou are the hope, I can&#39;re all that I have seenIt&#39;t need no one to prove your loveYou&#39, can&#39;re more than just a friendIt amazes me you feel the way you doI believe in you and nothing lessI believe in you:The Very Best Of Johnnie TaylorI Believe In YouLeAnn RimesYou breathe and life beginsYou speak and my world makes senseThat&#39:I Believe In You (You Believe In Me)歌手.baidu
其他类似问题
为您推荐：
believe的相关知识
等待您来回答
下载知道APP
随时随地咨询
出门在外也不愁In messy pursuit of the true, the good and the beautiful
154 commentsIt&#8217;s an absolutely fundamental question for any Christian. And surprisingly, when I&#8217;ve asked most people this question they rarely have an answer. And when they do have an answer, it is rarely sufficiently reasonable.
I think this is largely because it is something most all Christians take for granted. It&#8217;s a part of the Christian tradition. And even though we disagree on a lot of things within the denominational spectrum of divided Christianity, we assume we can all agree on the Bible. But .
For many the Bible is the basis for their entire belief. They go by the &#8220;bible alone.&#8221; Their entire faith is based on the &#8220;bible alone&#8221; they say&#8230;well, except for the whole part that explains why they believe in the Bible in the first place!
Let&#8217;s be clear. Nowhere in the Bible does it define what the Bible is. Nowhere does it list the books that are supposed to be in this so called Bible. Nowhere in the Bible does it clearly tell us how to use the Bible. And it certainly doesn&#8217;t say anywhere in it that it is the sole rule of our faith (as some Christians believe).
Christians can argue all day long about what the Bible says about this or that. They point to it and say things like, &#8220;well you should do it because it&#8217;s in the Bible!&#8221; But when you ask them why that matters? Why should I believe what the Bible says? Why can I trust it? They rarely have a good answer &#8211; at least not a reasonable one. It&#8217;s usually something like &#8220;because it&#8217;s true!&#8221; Or &#8220;I&#8217;ve read it and the Holy Spirit told me so.&#8221; Or &#8220;I just get a good, warm feeling when I read it.&#8221; But these answers are inadequate.
When you ask them &#8220;How do you know the Bible is the Word of God?&#8221; &#8211; a question that their entire faith rests upon &#8211; they rarely have an answer.
1) As Christians, we&#8217;ve got to do better than that.
2) How can we possibly understand how to interpret the Bible if we don&#8217;t know where it comes from? How can we be sure we are understanding it properly if we are not using it in the manner it was created to be used? And how do we know what that manner is when it&#8217;s not explained in the Bible itself?
I posted this question on my Facebook and Twitter status today to see what people thought. I got some very thoughtful answers. I got some very confusing answers. And I got some very honest answers like&#8230;&#8221;I&#8217;m not sure! I just do! But good question!&#8221;
Before we further address this question, we need to be clear about what we mean by &#8220;believing in the Bible.&#8221; Many of the answers I got were great, logical reasons to believe that what the Bible teaches historically (where it is intending to teach historically) is true. In other words, &#8220;believing in the Bible&#8221; means believing it is true. That&#8217;s fair enough. And there are lots of logical reasons that tell us the Bible is accurately documenting a lot of historical fact. And we can use that as evidence in figuring out what we believe.
But Christians don&#8217;t just believe the Bible is &#8220;true.&#8221; We believe it is the &#8220;Inspired&#8221; Word of God Himself. Not that it is &#8220;inspiring&#8221; &#8211; but that it is actually written by God Himself using human authors as instruments &#8211; The Word of God. This is quite a different thing. And quite a jump.
Just because I write something that is true, just makes it true. It doesn&#8217;t mean God wrote it Himself through me. So historical and modern evidence that Biblical stories are true and haven&#8217;t been proven wrong is no basis for the Christian belief in an Inspired Bible.
Additionally, some make the case that it is prophetic. But again, just because something or somebody is prophetic and predicted the future does not mean it is The Word of God necessarily.
At this point many throw their hands in the air and say, &#8220;I just believe it on faith.&#8221; But this is a cop-out. So you base your faith on the Bible? But then the reason you base your faith on the Bible is&#8230;more faith?
Did you just come up with this idea of an Inspired Bible out of thin air then?
It just doesn&#8217;t hold up.
So how do we know? Is there any basis for the claim that the Bible is actually the Word of God? The answer is in its origin.
So how did we get this Bible? Where did it come from? Did Jesus just drop it out of the sky during His ascension? Of course not.
So where did it come from?
The Bible is a collection of a bunch of writings that were written over thousands of years in different contexts, for different purposes, to different people, in different languages, across different cultures. And some how they all ended up together in one book. Kind of daunting thinking that we can just pull quotes out of context and formulate a coherent unified faith, huh? Makes it easy to see why so many denominations who claim to go by the Bible can all disagree on so many different things.
It&#8217;s also easy to see that these writings were not written as an all inclusive &#8220;manual&#8221; to live by. In fact, nowhere does the Bible claim to be such. So let&#8217;s undo some of these previous assumptions many have made and back it up even further.
We&#8217;ve established that Jesus did not define and put together the Bible. In fact, the entirety of the New Testament was not even finished being written until at least 50-60 years after Jesus died (so the first Christians were certainly not &#8220;bible-only&#8221; Christians).
So what did they have? What did Jesus found?
He founded a Church. And it is the Church that is the &#8220;pillar and bulwark&#8221; of the Truth (1 Tim 3:15). And we can know this with certainty by studying the validity of these historical texts (biblical and otherwise) and from what we know of human nature through our natural reason. Through reason we can logically come to know that Jesus existed, that he must have rose from the dead, and is therefore what he himself claimed to be &#8211; God. Through historical evidence and reason we can also come to know that God Himself established a Church and gave Peter (the first Pope) the keys of the kingdom and the power to bind and loose (Matthew 16:19) and gave its leaders the power to forgive sins (John 20:22-23) and to teach in His name.
With further reading of historical texts (biblical and otherwise from the early Christians) we can verify that
&#8211; i.e they believed in a priesthood, sacraments, Eucharist, papacy, hierarchy, teaching authority, Apostolic succession, etc.
It is also undisputed, historical fact that the Catholic Church set and confirmed the New Testament Canon throughout history and definitively at the end of the 4th century. They are the ones who decided which early Christian writings were &#8220;Inspired&#8221; and therefore included in the canon of the Bible and which writings were not (indeed there were many that were not).
Again, there were lots of writings out there that may have been &#8220;true.&#8221; But they didn&#8217;t make it into the Canon just for being true&#8230;they were instead left out because the Church determined them to not be &#8220;Inspired.&#8221; It was the leaders of the Catholic Church that decided all of this. They are the ones who discerned which writings truly were &#8220;The Word of God.&#8221;
So the authenticity of the Biblical canon &#8211; and therefore, indirectly, the Bible itself &#8211; rests on the authority of the Catholic Church. Either the Catholic Church had the authority and capacity to do this or they didn&#8217;t. We can see through history and reason that they did have this authority. Therefore, I believe the Bible is the Inspired Word of God.
So the only rational reason we can believe that the Bible is the Inspired Word of God is essentially because the Catholic Church has revealed that to us through their authority and charism given to it by Christ. And if we trust the Catholic Church to determine its canon, perhaps we should also trust it to interpret it for us. After all, that&#8217;s why God gave us a Church with the authority to do such things.
&#8220;I would not believe in the Gospels were it not for the authority of the Catholic Church&#8221; &#8211; St. Augustine
Here&#8217;s some
concerning this topic if you&#8217;d like.
It&#8217;s a good write up &#8211; still summarized but slightly more in depth.
Thanks for everyone&#8217;s feedback and thoughts today!
Blogma Favorites
Choose a topicBelieve in yourself and all that you are.搞不懂语法
翻译：相信你自己,相信你自己的一切.believe in后面两个宾语：yourself 和 all,而that you are是that的后置定语（定语从句）.如果对你有所帮助,请点击我回答下面的“选为满意回答”按钮,
为您推荐：
其他类似问题
扫描下载二维码