You have reached a degraded version
because you're using an unsupported version of Internet Explorer. For a
experience, please upgrade or use a
David Purdum, ESPN Staff Writer
Giants only team to open with win total of 90 at Atlantis Casino
The San Francisco Giants and Chicago Cubs are a notch above the rest of the National League, while the American League is wide-open, according to season win-total expectations released Thursday by the sportsbook at the Atlantis Casino in Reno, Nevada.The Giants are the only team to open with a win total of 90. They are followed closely by the Cubs at 89 and the New York Mets at 88."To me, the Giants, top-to-bottom, have the least amount of question marks," Atlantis sportsbook director Steve Mikkelson said. "The Cubs are a very good, but they have these youngsters. What if Kris Bryant goes into a slump? They have a lot swing-and-miss guess."The St. Louis Cardinals, Washington Nationals, Pittsburgh Pirates and Los Angeles Dodgers also have win totals of 87 or greater.In the American League, the Kansas City Royals are tops. The defending World Series champs opened at 87 wins (-115 under)."In the American League, to me, every team, except for the [Oakland] A's, think they can win it," Mikkelson said. "Unlike the National League, where there are eight teams really fighting for the five spots, in the American League, there are 14 teams fighting for the five slots."The rebuilding Atlanta Braves have the lowest win-total expectations at 65. The Philadelphia Phillies and Colorado Rockies are the only others with win totals in the 60s.The Atlantis Casino posted the totals Thursday afternoon. Limits are $500. It's the 10th straight year Mikkelson has been first in posting season win totals on the market. He said the hardest team to set this year was his favorite team, the Boston Red Sox. He went with 85.5."I always have those high Red Sox expectations," Mikkelson said. "I got burnt last year, thinking they were going to do it. They obviously finished last."Secondary Menu
Breadcrumb
Sales Tax Rates in Major U.S. Cities
Sales Tax Rates in Major U.S. Cities
Sales taxes in the United States are levied not only by state governments but also by city, county, Native American, and special district governments. In many cases these local sales taxes can have a profound impact on the total rate that consumers see at the check-out register.
Several private firms maintain databases of the sales tax rates in the 9,600 local jurisdictions in the United States that levy them. Here, we list the combined state and local sales tax rates in major U.S. cities, defined as all U.S. Census-designated incorporated places with a population over 200,000. This report complements our annual calculation of the average of all local sales taxes in each state.[1]
Highest and Lowest Sales Taxes Among Major Cities
Birmingham and Montgomery, both in Alabama, have the highest combined state and local sales tax rate among major U.S. cities, at 10 percent. They are followed by Chicago, I Glendale, A and Seattle, Washington, each with rates of 9.5 percent.
Portland, Oregon and Anchorage, Alaska have neither a state nor local sales tax. Honolulu, Hawaii has the third lowest sales tax among major cities with a rate of 4.5 however, Hawaii's overly broad sales tax makes this not strictly comparable with other states. Five local jurisdictions in Virginia (Arlington, Chesapeake, Norfolk, Richmond, and Virginia Beach) are also relatively low on the list, levying just a 5 percent statewide sales tax.
The Role of Competition in Sales Tax
Avoidance of sales tax is most likely to occur in areas where there is a significant difference between two jurisdictions' sales tax rates. Research indicates that consumers can and do leave high-tax areas to make major purchases in low-tax areas, such as from cities to suburbs.[2] For example, strong evidence exists that Chicago-area consumers make major purchases in surrounding suburbs or online to avoid Chicago's high sales tax rates.[3] At the statewide level, businesses sometimes locate just outside the borders of high sales tax areas to avoid being subjected to their rates. The state of Delaware actually uses its state border welcome sign to remind motorists that Delaware is the "Home of Tax-Free Shopping."[4] State and local governments should be cautious about raising rates too high relative to their neighbors because doing so may lead to revenue losses despite the higher tax rate.
Sales Tax Bases: The Other Half of the Equation
This report ranks states and cities based on tax rates and does not account for differences in tax bases (the structure of sales taxes, defining what is taxable and non-taxable). States can vary greatly in this regard. For instance, most states exempt groceries from the sales tax, others tax groceries at a limited rate, and still others tax groceries at the same rate as all other products.[5] Some states exempt clothing or tax it at a reduced rate.[6] The taxation of services and business-to-business transactions also vary widely by state.[7] Experts generally agree that Hawaii has the broadest sales tax in the United States, taxing many products multiple times and, by one estimate, ultimately taxing 99.21 percent of the state's personal income. This base is far wider than the national median, where the sales tax base applies to 34.46 percent of personal income. [8]
Conclusion
Of course, sales taxes are just one part of an overall tax structure and should be considered in context. For example, Washington State has high sales tax Oregon has no sales tax but high income taxes. While many factors influence business location and investment decisions, sales taxes are something within policymakers' control that can have immediate impacts. One gauge of competitiveness is how a city's sales tax rate compares to its neighbors.
Table 1: State and Local Tax Rates in Cities with Population above 200,000, As of April 1, 2012
State Rate
Local Rate
Total Rate
Birmingham (a)
Montgomery
Washington
Baton Rouge
New Orleans (b)
Scottsdale
Fremont (c)
California
Long Beach (c)
California
Los Angeles (c)
California
Oakland (c)
California
Washington
San Francisco (c)
California
Saint Louis
Oklahoma City
Austin (d)
Corpus Christi
Fort Worth
San Jose (c)
California
San Antonio
North Las Vegas
Aurora (e)
Philadelphia
Pennsylvania
San Bernardino (c)
California
Stockton (c)
California
Fresno (c)
California
Kansas City (f)
Minneapolis
Anaheim (c)
California
Chula Vista (c)
California
Irvine (c)
California
Riverside (c)
California
Sacramento (c)
California
San Diego (c)
California
Santa Ana (c)
California
Saint Paul
Colorado Springs
Modesto (c)
California
North Carolina
Bakersfield (c)
California
North Carolina
Fayetteville
North Carolina
Fort Wayne
Indianapolis
Jersey City
New Jersey
New Jersey
Jacksonville
Pittsburgh
Pennsylvania
Saint Petersburg
Albuquerque (h)
New Mexico
Columbus (i)
Greensboro
North Carolina
North Carolina
Winston-Salem
North Carolina
Cincinnati
Massachusetts
Des Moines
Louisville
Washington
District of Columbia
Arlington (c), (j)
Chesapeake (c)
Richmond (c)
Virginia Beach (c)
Honolulu (h), (k)
(a) Most of Birmingham is located within Jefferson County and is subject to a 10 percent sales tax. However, part of the city lies in Shelby County and is subject to a total rate of 9 percent.
(b) Most of New Orleans is located within Orleans Parish and is subject to a 9 percent sales tax. However, part of the city lies in Jefferson Parish
and is subject to a total rate of 8.75 percent.
(c) California (1%) and Virginia (1%) levy mandatory, statewide add-on sales taxe these are included in their state sales tax rates.
(d) Most of Austin is located within Travis and Williamson counties and is subject to an 8.25 percent sales tax. However, part of the city lies in Hays County and is subject to a total rate of 7.25 percent.
(e) Most of Aurora is located within Arapahoe County and is subject to an 8 percent sales tax. However, part of the city lies in Adams County and is subject to a total rate of 8.5 percent.
(f) Most of Kansas City is located within Jackson County and is subject to a 7.85 percent sales tax. However, part of the city lies in Clay County and is subject to a total rate of 7.6 percent.
(g) Most of Omaha is located within Douglas County and is subject to a 7 percent sale tax. However, part of the city lies in Sarpy County and is subject to a total rate of 5.5 percent.
(h) The sales taxes in Hawaii and New Mexico have broad bases that include many services.
(i) Most of Columbus is located within Franklin County and is subject to a 6.75 percent sales tax. However, part of the city lies in Delaware County and is subject to a total rate of 7.25 percent.
(j) Arlington is a county without any incorporated municipalities. However, we treat it as a city here because it is included in the Census Bureau’s annual list of incorporated places.
(k) In the table, "Honolulu" refers to the incorporated portion of the larger City and County of Honolulu.
Sources: Sales Tax Clearinghouse, U.S. Census Bureau, Google Maps
[1] See Scott Drenkard, State & Local Sales Taxes in 2012, Tax Foundation Fiscal Fact No. 291, Feb. 14, 2012, at http://www.taxfoundation.org/legacy/show/27967.html.
[2] Mehmet Serkan Tosun & Mark Skidmore, Cross-Border Shopping and the Sales Tax: A Reexamination of Food Purchases in West Virginia (Working Paper, 2005), available at http://www.rri.wvu.edu/pdffiles/Tosunwp2005-7.pdf. See also Randolph T. Beard, Paula A. Gant, Richard P. Saba, Border-Crossing Sales, Tax Avoidance, and State Tax Policies: An Application to Alcohol, Southern Economic Journal, 64( 1), 293-306 (1997).
[3] Susan Chandler, The Sales Tax Sidestep, The Chicago Tribune, July 20, 2008, at //business/_1_sales-tax-tax-avoidance-tax-landscape
[4] Raise taxes, and they'll move, constituents tell one delegate, , Aug. 3, 2011, //raise-taxes-and-theyll-move-constituents-tell-one-delegate/
[5] For a list, see Tax Foundation Background Paper no. 62, 2012 State Business Tax Climate Index, http://www.taxfoundation.org/legacy/show/22661.html.
[6] State Sales Taxes on Clothing, Tax Foundation Tax Policy Blog (Jan. 24, 2012), http://taxfoundation.org/legacy/show/27915.html
[7] For a representative list, see Tax Foundation Background Paper no. 62, 2012 State Business Tax Climate Index, http://www.taxfoundation.org/legacy/show/22661.html.
[8] John Mikesell, The Disappearing Retail Sales Tax, State Tax Notes, Mar. 5, 1.
Tax Topic&
Related Articles
Key Findings
As of January 1, 2016, four states, the District of Columbia, and three local jurisdictions have enacted taxes on vapor products (electronic cigarettes), but their methods and levels of taxation vary dramatically.
In 2015, at...
Key Findings
Forty-five states and the District of Columbia collect statewide sales taxes.
Local sales taxes are collected in 38 states.
The five states with the highest average combined state and local sales tax rates are Tennessee (9.46...
If you found this material useful, please consider making a donation to the Tax Foundation.
Join the Tax Foundation's fight for sound tax policy
Tax Policy Blog
The official weblog of the Tax Foundation.
Recent Publications
Tax By State
Select a State
California
Connecticut
District of Columbia
Massachusetts
Mississippi
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
North Carolina
North Dakota
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Washington
West Virginia
Ask a Tax Expert
Contact information for Tax Foundation policy staff
Today is June 17, the date in 1930 when President Hoover signed the Smoot-Hawley tariff act into law. As the Great Depression began, Congress acted to protect American industry from foreign competition by raising tariffs...
Today is June 16, Adam Smith’s 293rd birthday. The Scottish author of The Wealth of Nations was arguably the first person to put pen to paper about what makes a good tax system, and the principles of sound tax policy ...