求职日记 中集_网络阅读_梦幻网络
您的位置：&>>&&>>&&>>&
求职日记 中集
4月3日。早晨。
提早了一个小时到南站可是的票像是未出嫁的闺女一样抢手早早的卖完无奈只有买无座票然后等着开闸之后上餐车有个座位来熬过这一个小时十八分钟。肚子里的早餐在摇晃有拥挤的餐车里跟着摇晃没有想到居然有那么多人没有买到票所以今天的餐车工作人员一直在忙碌。坐餐车有一个好处就是给自己个理由尝一下昂贵的动车餐并且可以选择正座而逃避倒座的命运。
回到家里妈妈自己做了些饭菜打算祭拜先人这样也不需要大热天爬上山扫墓。我回家得突然所以事先也不知道幸好没有穿鲜艳颜色的衣服
下午是新东方主管找我们谈话。到教室的时候绮阳已经进去了我和曹敏坐着聊天原来月日那场招聘会后就只剩下我们个人硕果仅存。这算是我们优胜劣汰的胜利还是新东方挑选老师的严格我想我们以后的日子一定不会好过
轮到我了。新东方主管伍小姐看上去很和气告诉我校长对我们几个人非常满意我们也要进入新东方的培训期由国内外部主管老师封一帆指导负责我们的培训内容培训期到月份会挑选一些优秀的老师去北京参加为期一周的再培训然后回来参加验收和到时候会有一群小鬼来验收并给我们打分通过了之后就进入暑假的上课在这之前就有两个问题一是我们得先通过培训和小鬼们的打分二是即使通过了暑假给我们每个人安排的课程也不会特别多那么我们就属于临时工性质并且不签订任何劳动只支付薪水而没有任何福利直到我们每周工作时间满小时之后才会有个转正的手续伍小姐还说这个过程可能会持续半年甚至一年也说不定看我们各自的教学和教学成果了
我汗&&想起大汐说幺子的一个词来形容我们特别贴切倒霉的孩子！
还有一件重要的事情，就是没有薪水或者薪水不足，那我等到小西装下市都买不到&&倒霉的孩子啊
4月6日。下午。
一直待在家里闷头思想课题。回想起号见过伍小姐之后，就见到了所谓杭州新东方第一把交椅的封一帆我们的指导老师。，看上去不会超过岁的家伙，居然义正言辞地对我说以后我的日子可能会是周末上课，周一到周五没有事情的生活，问我是否满意。是否满意？天呀，是你你会觉得很很满意吗？薪水合适当然没有话说，没有钱我呆在家和浪费光阴有差吗？当然，我还是说，适应吧，应该可以接受！我心想他应该是这个意思。然后他大手一挥说，&可以了，准备回去下个星期试讲，可以是一样的内容，但要换个形式。我更注重形式，而不是内容。&
就为了他这话，我苦索枯肠，以期在所谓形式上有所突破。可是，何谓形式？我一直不懂。不过，我属于幸运的，绮阳被封一帆批说风格不符，绮阳说内容不好可以换，风格不对，不就是让一个内向的人在数天之内变成活泼外向的人吗？理论上说，绮阳的&课题&难度比我的大多了。
从香港给我长途电话，说给我买了生日礼物，还有月应该就完成了她的硕士课程，可以衣锦还乡了！
终于，以后在杭州不是一个人逛街了呢！
4月9日。傍晚。
傍晚去帮魏拿些换洗的衣服，下了楼已经点半了，心想晚上说好回去和妈妈一起吃饭的，脚步就更匆忙了。在等公车的时候，心里满是郁闷，一方面由于新东方的工作，一方面这课题该怎么做。就在这个时候手机响了，陌生号码？
&，暴温柔的一个声音。
&啊？不好意思，我在路上听不清楚。&我猜想估摸又是哪家用人机构。
&哦，那能找个安静一点的角落吗？我们是￥&的，想做个电话面试。&
我承认，那个女的太温柔了，所以被它所迷惑了！&哦，好吧&&&
噼里啪啦的说了一堆，无非是些自我介绍啊，为什么投他们的单位啊之类的。天知道为什么，我当时可以说是瞎投的。结果，那个让人眩晕的甜美声音说，&可以唱一段歌吗？&
歌？现在？马路上？
之后，我就在众目睽睽之下又做了回疯子。首先，你应该很少见过一个中国人拿手机叽里呱啦说英文，还在那里自我介绍的吧！其次，作为一个正常人，绝对不会在马路上唱一闪一闪亮晶晶，满天都是小星星&&
最后才想起来，这家单位好像是找老师的&&要我一把年纪了装可爱装青春，还要又唱又跳的&&
4月10日。下午。
新东方终于来电话说明天下午点试讲。看看手中的，我不知道算不算是换了形式。我自创了三段式阅读法，结合电影作为开场，并且准备了自己的板书。这应该说是电影给我的灵感吧！如果封一帆觉得不满意也没有办法，因为我知道这个三段式阅读法还有很多地方没有完善，尤其是配合。只能说尝试一下吧。
我和魏说打算结束了这次试讲就回上海去拿些东西回家，应该再去办次毕业手续就结束了吧。想想那恍如隔世的年上海生活，也真是飞快。最好的朋友即将结婚，身边的同学也要各回各自的家了，我们又要有新的旅程，只是不知道我们都有没有准备好呢？
生日那天，黄磊，叶姐姐都给了我信息，没有想到曾经同学，他们还记得我和我那不值一提的生日。我想，有些事情，有些人，真的不需要太较真，因为社会很现实，它会让你忘记很多，这是个善忘的社会，也包括我和你！
谢谢那些祝福我生日快乐的朋友，也谢谢没有消息可依旧挂念我的朋友。还要谢谢曾经给过我深刻教训且无法遗忘的人！
Thank all of you.
相关信息：
Jack and Betty are celebrating their 50th wedding anniversary, when Jack asks his wife, &Betty, have you ever cheated on me?& Betty replies, &Oh Jack, why would you ask such a questi...（）
Star athletes have played an important part in the lives of young children as far back as history remembers sports and its heroes. Every youngster has had at least one hero that he worshipped above al...（）
Grandpa Nybakken loved life -- especially when he could play a trick on somebody. At those times, his large Norwegian frame shook with laughter while he feigned innocent surprise, exclaiming, &O...（）
There were only two unmarried men in the village. All the rest had found suitable partners, but Kalemeleme was so gentle that he would not stand up for his own rights, or anyone else's, while Kinku wa...（）
The Flood Towards the end of the Age of Bronze the human world became very cruel．Men grew hungry，impolite and ungodly．Neither rightn or law was respected any longer，and the rule of hospitality was for...（）
关键字含有“日记”的内容：
关键字含有“我们”的内容：
关键字含有“没有”的内容：
关键字含有“可以”的内容：
关键字含有“一个”的内容：
关键字含有“应该”的内容：
关键字含有“之后”的内容：
关键字含有“知道”的内容：您所在位置： &
&nbsp&&nbsp&nbsp&&nbsp
宁夏银川市唐徕回民中学学高二英语上学期12月月考试题.doc 16页
本文档一共被下载：
次 ,您可全文免费在线阅读后下载本文档。
文档加载中...广告还剩秒
需要金币：100 &&
宁夏银川市唐徕回民中学学高二英语上学期12月月考试题
你可能关注的文档：
··········
··········
宁夏银川市唐徕回民中学学年高二英语上学期12月月考试题
第一部分：听力理解（共两节，30分）
第一节：（共5小题；每小题1.5分，共7.5分）
听下面5段对话。每段对话后有一个小题，从题中所给的A.B.C三个选项中选出最佳选项，并标在试卷的相应位置上。听完每段对话后，你都有10秒钟时间回答有关小题和阅读下一小题。每段对话仅读一遍。
1. What’s the probably relationship between the two speakers?
A. Son and mom.
B. Child and nurse.
C. Student and teacher.
2. What does the man want to dress up as?
A. A rooster. B. A robot. C. A witch.
3. How many kinds of things does the woman remind the man?
A. 3. B. 2. C. 1.
4. How soon will the speakers arrive at the airport?
A. In 30 minutes.
B. In 50 minutes.
C. In 90 minutes.
5. What has the woman been doing?
A. Working. B. Writing C. Studying.
第二节：（共15小题；每小题1.5分，共22.5分）
听下面5段对话或独白。每段对话或独白后有几个小题，从题中所给的A.B.C三个选项中选出最佳选项，并标在试卷的相应位置。听每段对话或独白前，你将有时间阅读各个小题，每小题5秒钟；听完后，各个小题将给出5秒钟的作答时间。每段对话或独白读两遍。
听第6段对话，回答第6至7题。
6. Why is Rose in bad mood recently?
A. Her father is ill. B. Her father is dead. C. Her parents divorced.
7. What would the two speakers do to comfort her?
A. Talk with her.
B. Take her outside. C. Leave her alone.
听第7段对话，回答第8至9题。
8. What contest has the woman won?
A. The speech contest. B. The math contest. C. The English contest.
9. What does the man invite the woman to do?
A. Take part in his birthday party.
B. Meet his parents.
C. Have dinner with him.
听第8段对话，回答第10至12题。
Who does the woman have an interview with today?
A. The man. B. The professor. C. The visa official.
11. What does the woman want to study abroad?
A. Economy. B. English literature.
C. Philosophy.
12. Why was the woman denied a visa?
A. She’s not a good student.
B. She wants to work in America. C. She didn’t prepare enough.
听第9段对话，回答第13至16题。
13. What has Jane brought with her?
A. Her CV. B. Her diploma.
C. Her certificates
14. What’s the job Jane applied for?
A. International business. B. International traveling. C. International education.
15. How’s Jane’s English?
A. Perfect. B. Good. C. Not good.
16. What does Jane say it’s no prob
正在加载中，请稍后...An Important Kindle request
A Message from the Amazon Books Team
Dear Readers,
Just ahead of World War II, there was a radical invention that shook the foundations of book publishing. It was the paperback book. This was a time when movie tickets cost 10 or 20 cents, and books cost $2.50. The new paperback cost 25 cents & it was ten times cheaper. Readers loved the paperback and millions of copies were sold in just the first&year.
With it being so inexpensive and with so many more people able to afford to buy and read books, you would think the literary establishment of the day would have celebrated the invention of the paperback, yes? Nope. Instead, they dug in and circled the wagons. They believed low cost paperbacks would destroy literary culture and harm the industry (not to mention their own bank accounts). Many bookstores refused to stock them, and the early paperback publishers had to use unconventional methods of distribution & places like newsstands and drugstores. The famous author George Orwell came out publicly and said about the new paperback format, if "publishers had any sense, they would combine against them and suppress them." Yes, George Orwell was suggesting&collusion.
Well… history doesn't repeat itself, but it does&rhyme.
Fast forward to today, and it's the e-book's turn to be opposed by the literary establishment. Amazon and Hachette & a big US publisher and part of a $10 billion media conglomerate & are in the middle of a business dispute about e-books. We want lower e-book prices. Hachette does not. Many e-books are being released at $14.99 and even $19.99. That is unjustifiably high for an e-book. With an e-book, there's no printing, no over-printing, no need to forecast, no returns, no lost sales due to out of stock, no warehousing costs, no transportation costs, and there is no secondary market & e-books cannot be resold as used books. E-books can and should be less&expensive.
Perhaps channeling Orwell's decades old suggestion, Hachette has already been caught illegally colluding with its competitors to raise e-book prices. So far those parties have paid $166 million in penalties and restitution. Colluding with its competitors to raise prices wasn't only illegal, it was also highly disrespectful to Hachette's&readers.
The fact is many established incumbents in the industry have taken the position that lower e-book prices will "devalue books" and hurt "Arts and Letters." They're wrong. Just as paperbacks did not destroy book culture despite being ten times cheaper, neither will e-books. On the contrary, paperbacks ended up rejuvenating the book industry and making it stronger. The same will happen with&e-books.
Many inside the echo-chamber of the industry often draw the box too small. They think books only compete against books. But in reality, books compete against mobile games, television, movies, Facebook, blogs, free news sites and more. If we want a healthy reading culture, we have to work hard to be sure books actually are competitive against these other media types, and a big part of that is working hard to make books less&expensive.
Moreover, e-books are highly price elastic. This means that when the price goes down, customers buy much more. We've quantified the price elasticity of e-books from repeated measurements across many titles. For every copy an e-book would sell at $14.99, it would sell 1.74 copies if priced at $9.99. So, for example, if customers would buy 100,000 copies of a particular e-book at $14.99, then customers would buy 174,000 copies of that same e-book at $9.99. Total revenue at $14.99 would be $1,499,000. Total revenue at $9.99 is $1,738,000. The important thing to note here is that the lower price is good for all parties involved: the customer is paying 33% less and the author is getting a royalty check 16% larger and being read by an audience that's 74% larger. The pie is simply&bigger.
But when a thing has been done a certain way for a long time, resisting change can be a reflexive instinct, and the powerful interests of the status quo are hard to move. It was never in George Orwell's interest to suppress paperback books & he was wrong about&that.
And despite what some would have you believe, authors are not united on this issue. When the Authors Guild recently wrote on this, they titled their post: "Amazon-Hachette Debate Yields Diverse Opinions Among Authors" (the comments to this post are worth a read).
A petition started by another group of authors and aimed at Hachette, titled "Stop Fighting Low Prices and Fair Wages," garnered over 7,600 signatures.
And there are myriad articles and posts, by authors and readers alike, supporting us in our effort to keep prices low and build a healthy reading culture. Author David Gaughran's recent interview is another piece worth&reading.
We recognize that writers reasonably want to be left out of a dispute between large companies. Some have suggested that we "just talk." We tried that. Hachette spent three months stonewalling and only grudgingly began to even acknowledge our concerns when we took action to reduce sales of their titles in our store. Since then Amazon has made three separate offers to Hachette to take authors out of the middle. We first suggested that we (Amazon and Hachette) jointly make author royalties whole during the term of the dispute. Then we suggested that authors receive 100% of all sales of their titles until this dispute is resolved. Then we suggested that we would return to normal business operations if Amazon and Hachette's normal share of revenue went to a literacy charity. But Hachette, and their parent company Lagardere, have quickly and repeatedly dismissed these offers even though e-books represent 1% of their revenues and they could easily agree to do so. They believe they get leverage from keeping their authors in the&middle.
We will never give up our fight for reasonable e-book prices. We know making books more affordable is good for book culture. We'd like your help. Please email Hachette and copy&us.
Hachette CEO, Michael Pietsch:
Copy us at:
Please consider including these&points:
We have noted your illegal collusion. Please stop working so hard to overcharge for ebooks. They can and should be less&expensive.
Lowering e-book prices will help & not hurt & the reading culture, just like paperbacks&did.
Stop using your authors as leverage and accept one of Amazon's offers to take them out of the&middle.
Especially if you're an author yourself: Remind them that authors are not united on this&issue.
Thanks for your support.
The Amazon Books Team
Further Reading
(If you read just one piece, we recommend this one)
JJ Marsh/David Gaughran | July 30, 2014
(We recommend reading the comments on this one)
Authors Guild | July 23, 2014
Writers and Readers | July 3, 2014
Hugh Howey | July 23, 2014
Frank Schaeffer | July 21, 2014
Barry Eisler | July 30, 2014
David Gaughran | May 26, 2014
Hugh Howey | May 31, 2014
Mishka Shubaly | June 5, 2014
Matthew Ingram | July 2, 2014
Hugh Howey | July 30, 2014
Martin Shepard | May 27, 2014