的海词问答和网友补充：
相关词典网站：英语翻译别跟我说是vigorously propagandized这个绝对不对_百度作业帮
英语翻译别跟我说是vigorously propagandized这个绝对不对
英语翻译别跟我说是vigorously propagandized这个绝对不对
make huge efforts to promote/ advocate something
tremendously promote and advocate sth
to do sth 大力做某事Vigorously promote
1. a vigorous campaign: to launch a vigorous ca2. vigorous promotional efforts : xxx will continue to make vigorous promotional efforts in accordance with economic and trade policies and the WTO资讯|备考|互动
托福TPO11阅读真题(文本+答案+翻译)：Part3
来源：新东方在线论坛
摘要：托福TPO11阅读真题(文本+答案+翻译)：Part3 Begging by Nestlings雏鸟的乞食行为，更多托福TPO阅读真题、TPO阅读文本、TPO阅读答案、TPO阅读翻译尽在新东方在线托福考试频道！
　　TPO11阅读真题(文本+答案+翻译)：Part3 Begging by Nestlings雏鸟的乞食行为，更多托福TPO阅读真题、TPO阅读文本、TPO阅读答案、TPO阅读翻译尽在新东方在线托福考试频道！　　Begging by Nestlings　　Many signals that animals make seem to impose on the signalers costs that are overly damaging. A classic example is noisy begging by nestling songbirds when a parent returns to the nest with food. These loud cheeps and peeps might give the location of the nest away to a listening hawk or raccoon, resulting in the death of the defenseless nestlings. In fact, when tapes of begging tree swallows were played at an artificial swallow nest containing an egg, the egg in that &noisy& nest was taken or destroyed by predators before the egg in a nearby quiet nest in 29 of 37 trials.　　Further evidence for the costs of begging comes from a study of differences in the begging calls of warbler species that nest on the ground versus those that nest in the relative safety of trees. The young of ground-nesting warblers produce begging cheeps of higher frequencies than do their tree-nesting relatives. These higher-frequency sounds do not travel as far, and so may better conceal the individuals producing them, who are especially vulnerable to predators in their ground nests. David Haskell created artificial nests with clay eggs and placed them on the ground beside a tape recorder that played the begging calls of either tree-nesting or of ground-nesting warblers. The eggs &advertised& by the tree-nesters' begging calls were found bitten significantly more often than the eggs associated with the ground-nesters' calls.　　The hypothesis that begging calls have evolved properties that reduce their potential for attracting predators yields a prediction: baby birds of species that experience high rates of nest predation should produce softer begging signals of higher frequency than nestlings of other species less often victimized by nest predators. This prediction was supported by data collected in one survey of 24 species from an Arizona forest, more evidence that predator pressure favors the evolution of begging calls that are hard to detect and pinpoint.　　Given that predators can make it costly to beg for food, what benefit do begging nestlings derive from their communications? One possibility is that a noisy baby bird provides accurate signals of its real hunger and good health, making it worthwhile for the listening parent to give it food in a nest where several other offspring are usually available to be fed. If this hypothesis is true, then it follows that nestlings should adjust the intensity of their signals in relation to the signals produced by their nestmates, who are competing for parental attention. When experimentally deprived baby robins are placed in a nest with normally fed siblings, the hungry nestlings beg more loudly than usual-but so do their better-fed siblings, though not as loudly as the hungrier birds.　　If parent birds use begging intensity to direct food to healthy offspring capable of vigorous begging, then parents should make food delivery decisions on the basis of their offsprings' calls. Indeed, if you take baby tree swallows out of a nest for an hour feeding half the set and starving the other half, when the birds are replaced in the nest, the starved youngsters beg more loudly than the fed birds, and the parent birds feed the active beggars more than those who beg less vigorously.　　As these experiments show, begging apparently provides a signal of need that parents use to make judgments about which offspring can benefit most from a feeding. But the question arises, why don't nestlings beg loudly when they aren't all that hungry? By doing so, they could possibly secure more food, which should result in more rapid growth or larger size, either of which is advantageous. The answer lies apparently not in the increased energy costs of exaggerated begging-such energy costs are small relative to the potential gain in calories-but rather in the damage that any successful cheater would do to its siblings, which share genes with one another. An individual's success in propagating his or her genes can be affected by more than just his or her own personal reproductive success. Because close relatives have many of the same genes, animals that harm their close relatives may in effect be destroying some of their own genes. Therefore, a begging nestling that secures food at the expense of its siblings might actually leave behind fewer copies of its genes overall than it might otherwise.　　Paragraph 1: Many signals that animals make seem to impose on the signalers costs that are overly damaging. A classic example is noisy begging by nestling songbirds when a parent returns to the nest with food. These loud cheeps and peeps might give the location of the nest away to a listening hawk or raccoon, resulting in the death of the defenseless nestlings. In fact, when tapes of begging tree swallows were played at an artificial swallow nest containing an egg, the egg in that &noisy& nest was taken or destroyed by predators before the egg in a nearby quiet nest in 29 of 37 trials.　　1. The phrase &impose on& in the passage is closest in meaning to　　○ increase for　　○ remove from　　○ place on　　○ distribute to　　2. According to paragraph 1, the experiment with tapes of begging tree swallows establishes which of the following?　　○ Begging by nestling birds can attract the attention of predators to the nest.　　○ Nest predators attack nests that contain nestlings more frequently than they attack nests that contain only eggs.　　○ Tapes of begging nestlings attract predators to the nest less frequently than real begging calls do.　　○ Nest predators have no other means of locating bird nests except the begging calls of nestling birds.　　Paragraph 2: Further evidence for the costs of begging comes from a study of differences in the begging calls of warbler species that nest on the ground versus those that nest in the relative safety of trees. The young of ground-nesting warblers produce begging cheeps of higher frequencies than do their tree-nesting relatives. These higher-frequency sounds do not travel as far, and so may better conceal the individuals producing them, who are especially vulnerable to predators in their ground nests. David Haskell created artificial nests with clay eggs and placed them on the ground beside a tape recorder that played the begging calls of either tree-nesting or of ground-nesting warblers. The eggs &advertised& by the tree-nesters' begging calls were found bitten significantly more often than the eggs associated with the ground-nesters' calls.　　3. The word &artificial& in the passage is closest in meaning to　　○ attractive　　○ not real　　○ short-term　　○ well designed　　4. Paragraph 2 indicates that the begging calls of tree nesting warblers　　○ put them at more risk than ground-nesting warblers experience　　○ can be heard from a greater distance than those of ground-nesting warblers　　○ are more likely to conceal the signaler than those of ground-nesting warblers　　○ have higher frequencies than those of ground-nesting warblers　　5. The experiment described in paragraph 2 supports which of the following conclusions?　　○ Predators are unable to distinguish between the begging cheeps of ground-nesting and those of tree-nesting warblers except by the differing frequencies of the calls.　　○ When they can find them, predators prefer the eggs of tree-nesting warblers to those of ground-nesting warblers.　　○ The higher frequencies of the begging cheeps of ground-nesting warblers are an adaptation to the threat that ground-nesting birds face from predators.　　○ The danger of begging depends more on the frequency of the begging cheep than on how loud it is.　　Paragraph 3: The hypothesis that begging calls have evolved properties that reduce their potential for attracting predators yields a prediction: baby birds of species that experience high rates of nest predation should produce softer begging signals of higher frequency than nestlings of other species less often victimized by nest predators. This prediction was supported by data collected in one survey of 24 species from an Arizona forest, more evidence that predator pressure favors the evolution of begging calls that are hard to detect and pinpoint.　　6. The word &prediction& in the passage is closest in meaning to　　○ surprise　　○ discovery　　○ explanation　　○ expectation　　7. The word &pinpoint& in the passage is closest in meaning to　　○ observe　　○ locate exactly　　○ copy accurately　　○ recognize　　Paragraph 4: Given that predators can make it costly to beg for food, what benefit do begging nestlings derive from their communications? One possibility is that a noisy baby bird provides accurate signals of its real hunger and good health, making it worthwhile for the listening parent to give it food in a nest where several other offspring are usually available to be fed. If this hypothesis is true, then it follows that nestlings should adjust the intensity of their signals in relation to the signals produced by their nestmates, who are competing for parental attention. When experimentally deprived baby robins are placed in a nest with normally fed siblings, the hungry nestlings beg more loudly than usual-but so do their better-fed siblings, though not as loudly as the hungrier birds.　　8. The word &derive& in the passage is closest in meaning to　　○ require　　○ gain　　○ use　　○ produce　　Paragraph 4: Given that predators can make it costly to beg for food, what benefit do begging nestlings derive from their communications? One possibility is that a noisy baby bird provides accurate signals of its real hunger and good health, making it worthwhile for the listening parent to give it food in a nest where several other offspring are usually available to be fed. If this hypothesis is true, then it follows that nestlings should adjust the intensity of their signals in relation to the signals produced by their nestmates, who are competing for parental attention. When experimentally deprived baby robins are placed in a nest with normally fed siblings, the hungry nestlings beg more loudly than usual-but so do their better-fed siblings, though not as loudly as the hungrier birds.　　Paragraph 5: If parent birds use begging intensity to direct food to healthy offspring capable of vigorous begging, then parents should make food delivery decisions on the basis of their offsprings' calls. Indeed, if you take baby tree swallows out of a nest for an hour feeding half the set and starving the other half, when the birds are replaced in the nest, the starved youngsters beg more loudly than the fed birds, and the parent birds feed the active beggars more than those who beg less vigorously.　　9. In paragraphs 4 and 5, what evidence supports the claim that the intensity of nestling begging calls is a good indicator of which offspring in a nest would most benefit from a feeding?　　○ When placed in a nest with hungry robins, well-fed robins did not beg for food.　　○ Among robin nestlings, the intensity of begging decreased the more the nestlings were fed.　　○ Hungry tree swallow nestlings begged louder than well-fed nestlings in the same nest.　　○ Hungry tree swallow nestlings continued to beg loudly until they were fed whereas well-fed nestlings soon stopped begging.　　10. It can be inferred from paragraphs 4 and 5 that parent songbirds normally do not feed　　○ nestlings that are too weak to beg for food as vigorously as their nestmates　　○ more than one hungry nestling during a single visit to the nest　　○ offspring that were fed by the parents on the previous visit to the nest　　○ nestlings that have been removed and then later put back into their nest　　Paragraph 6: As these experiments show, begging apparently provides a signal of need that parents use to make judgments about which offspring can benefit most from a feeding. But the question arises, why don't nestlings beg loudly when they aren't all that hungry? By doing so, they could possibly secure more food, which should result in more rapid growth or larger size, either of which is advantageous. The answer lies apparently not in the increased energy costs of exaggerated begging-such energy costs are small relative to the potential gain in calories-but rather in the damage that any successful cheater would do to its siblings, which share genes with one another. An individual's success in propagating his or her genes can be affected by more than just his or her own personal reproductive success. Because close relatives have many of the same genes, animals that harm their close relatives may in effect be destroying some of their own genes. Therefore, a begging nestling that secures food at the expense of its siblings might actually leave behind fewer copies of its genes overall than it might otherwise.　　11. In paragraph 6, the author compares the energy costs of vigorous begging with the potential gain in calories from such begging in order to　　○ explain why begging for food vigorously can lead to faster growth and increased size　　○ explain how begging vigorously can increase an individual's chance of propagating its own genes　　○ point out a weakness in a possible explanation for why nestlings do not always beg vigorously　　○ argue that the benefits of vigorous begging outweigh any possible disadvantages　　12. According to paragraph 6, which of the following explains the fact that a well-fed nestling does not beg loudly for more food?　　○There is no benefit for a nestling to get more food than it needs to survive.　　○By begging loudly for food it does not need, a nestling would unnecessarily expose itself to danger from predators.　　○If a nestling begs loudly when it is not truly hungry, then when it is truly hungry its own begging may be drowned out by that of its well-fed siblings.　　○More of a nestling's genes will be passed to the next generation if its hungry siblings get enough food to survive.　　Paragraph 1: Many signals that animals make seem to impose on the signalers costs that are overly damaging. ■A classic example is noisy begging by nestling songbirds when a parent returns to the nest with food. ■These loud cheeps and peeps might give the location of the nest away to a listening hawk or raccoon, resulting in the death of the defenseless nestlings. ■In fact, when tapes of begging tree swallows were played at an artificial swallow nest containing an egg, the egg in that &noisy& nest was taken or destroyed by predators before the egg in a nearby quiet nest in 29 of 37 trials. ■　　13. Look at the four squares [■] that indicate where the following sentence could be added to the passage.　　The cheeping provides important information to the parent, but it could also attract the attention of others.　　Where would the sentence best fit?　　14. Directions: An introductory sentence for a brief summary of the passage is provided below. Complete the summary by selecting the THREE answer that express the most important ideas in the passage. Some sentences do not belong in the summary because they express ideas that not presented in the passage or are minor ideas in the passage. This question is worth 2 points.　　Experiments have shed much light on the begging behaviors of baby songbirds.　　●　　●　　●　　Answer Choices　　○ Songbird species that are especially vulnerable to predators have evolved ways of reducing the dangers associated with begging calls.　　○ Songbird parents focus their feeding effort on the nestlings that beg loudest for food.　　○ It is genetically disadvantageous for nestlings to behave as if they are really hungry when they are not really hungry.　　○ The begging calls of songbird nestlings provide a good example of overly damaging cost to signalers of signaling.　　○ The success with which songbird nestlings communicate their hunger to their parents is dependent on the frequencies of the nestlings' begging calls.　　○ Songbird nestlings have evolved several different ways to communicate the intensity of their hunger to their parents.　　
责任编辑：shenyueyue
版权及免责声明
① "新东方在线"上的内容，包括文章、资料、资讯等， 本网注明"稿件来源：新东方在线"的，其版权 均为"新东方在线"或北京新东方迅程网络科技有限公司所有 ，任何公司、媒体、网站或个人未经授权不得转载、链接、转贴或以其他方式使用。已经得到 "新东方在线"许可 的媒体、网站，在使用时必须注明"稿件来源：新东方"，违者本网站将依法追究责任。
② "新东方在线" 未注明"稿件来源：新东方"的 文章、资料、资讯等 均为转载稿，本网站转载出于传递更多信息之目的，并不意味着赞同其观点或证实其内容的真实性。如其他媒体、网站或个人从本网站下载使用，必须保留本网站注明的"稿件来源"，并自负版权等法律责任。如擅自篡改为 " 稿件来源：新东方 " ，本网站将依法追究其法律责任。
③ 如本网转载稿涉及版权等问题，请作者见稿后在两周内与新东方在线联系。
托福网络课堂
论坛更精彩
论坛版主帮你起英文名~快来
论坛翻译大赛 赢证书没商量
今天 你读书了么？
星座诞生石 哪块属于你
17天如何学会一门外语
你学英语到底是为了什么？
资料下载排行榜
托福公开课
托福热报课程
2015托福时间表
10日 11日 25日 31日
7日 14日 28日
13日 14日 27日
4日 11日 12日当前位置： &
求翻译：vigorously stirred mixture of saturated aqueous NaHCO3 (3是什么意思？
vigorously stirred mixture of saturated aqueous NaHCO3 (3
问题补充：
大力搅拌混合物的饱和碳酸氢钠溶液（3
有力地激起了混合气体的饱和水溶性nahco3(3
正在翻译，请等待...
大力搅拌混合物的饱和水溶液 NaHCO3 （3
正在翻译，请等待...
我来回答：
参考资料：
* 验证码：
登录后回答可以获得积分奖励，并可以查看和管理所有的回答。 |
我要翻译和提问
请输入您需要翻译的文本！爱词霸质量反馈
非常抱歉，来自您ip的请求异常频繁，为了保护其他用户的正常访问，只能暂时禁止您目前的访问。
如果您频繁碰到这样的问题，请您删除浏览器中的cookie再尝试访问，也可以联系我们。
对于给您带来的不便我们深表歉意，希望您继续支持爱词霸。
需要继续访问，请输入四位字母验证码
& 2012 金山软件