第三方登录：有谁翻译一下
那个最后论文的要求啊 | MOOC学院 果壳网旗下慕课学习社区
有谁翻译一下
那个最后论文的要求啊
Navigating the Peer Assessment Page and the Peer Assessment Submission Page:The peer assessment page is found , or via the peer assessment tab on the side menu. The peer assessment submission page, where you can find both the peer assessment questions and submit your assignment, is accessed via the peer assessment page. To access the peer assessment submission page, click on the “go to assignments” button underneath the peer assessment timetable on the peer assessment page. The peer assessment submission page will go live at 9:00 am, 27th October. The peer assessment page provides you with a timetable of when you must have your assignment submitted by (11:00 pm, 10th November), and when you must have your (mandatory: two) evaluations submitted by (11:00 pm, 24th November). Note that the deadlines are set to London, UK time. The peer assessment submission page provides you with detailed information about how the evaluation process works, as well as the questions you can choose from. Please note that the evaluation criteria, which it will also be helpful to consult in writing your assignment, are located underneath the questions. The text field in which you can write your assignment is also located underneath the questions (it’s like a comment field on the forums). Using the buttons at the bottom of the peer assessment submission page (below the evaluation criteria) you can save a draft of your work or submit your finished assignment. Don’t worry if you submit your assignment by accident or if, after submitting your assignment, you change your mind about it – you can re-submit a new version of your assignment at any time up until the deadline for the submission of assignments. Only the latest version of your assignment will be assessed. Word Limit Policy:Your assignment can be up to 750 words long, and must be written in English (sorry!). The number of words in your assignment will be counted automatically. A 10% leeway (75 words) is allowed for your title (the question you have chosen to answer) and any citations. Citations:If you want to cite material from the lectures (video transcripts, slides and handouts) or other sources in your essay, please use a consistent citation policy. For example, if quoting from the week two handout you might insert a parenthesis after the quote like the following: (Week Two Handout, p. 3). If quoting from a source other than the lecture materials, you might insert a parenthesis after the quote like the following: (Tolstoy, War and Peace, p. 24). You should also provide a bibliography at the end of your assignment where, at least, sources other than the lecture materials are cited in full, e.g.: Tolstoy, Leo, War and Peace, (London: Penguin Classics, 2006).
This is good philosophical (academic) practice. Given that the assignment has a limit of 750 words, hopefully your bibliography will not be too long. And, again, there is a leeway of 75 words over and above the official word count specifically intended to account for the title of your assignment and any citations. Questions:There are two questions for each week of the course. Only choose one question out of the fourteen available. These questions are: Week 1: -- Philosophy is often classified as a purely reflective method of inquiry into reality and our place in it. But science also investigates reality and our place in it with impressive results. Why (if at all) should we engage in philosophical inquiry into these matters?Week 1: -- Do you find Dr. Wards definition of philosophy convincing, and can there be such a thing as the ‘right way’ of thinking about things?Week 2: -- If knowledge is not justified true belief, then how might we go about satisfying the anti-luck intuition?Week 2: -- If we can’t rule out sceptical hypotheses, can we know anything about the world?Week 3: -- What is John Searle’s ‘Chinese Room’ argument meant to illustrate, and do you agree that it succeeds in this aim?Week 3: -- Could a computer have a mind?Week 4: -- Is relativism a form of objectivism?Week 4: -- Should we be moral relativists?Week 5: -- What are the advantages and drawbacks of intellectual autonomy and intellectual solidarity?Week 5: -- Was Hume right to think that one should never believe that a miracle has taken place on the basis of testimony?Week 6: -- What do you think of Lipton’s view that inference to the best explanation warrants conclusions about unobserved unobservables (such as trilobites and dinosaurs) not more than about unobservables (such as electrons and neutrinos)?Week 6: -- Are there good reasons to think that scientific theories should be true, rather than “merely” empirically adequate?Week 7: -- Explain David Lewis’s view of causal loops.Week 7: -- Is time travel logically possible? Please be advised that you cannot make up your own question. This is because you are grading each other – it would be unfair to present your peers with an assignment on a topic they have no experience of. What Kind of Writing Do the Assignments Require?It is desirable that your assignment draws on what has been discussed in the lecture material. (This is the point of the sixth of the evaluation criteria – “Engaging with the material”.) Indeed, your assignment should aim to illustrate that you have understood the main points of the lecture material. (This is the point of the seventh of the evaluation criteria – “Understanding the material”.) However, whilst such material should be discussed carefully, of course you can go beyond such material. Your assignment should provide an argument, i.e., make a claim and support that claim with reasons. (This is the point of the third of the evaluation criteria – “Argument”.) This claim should represent your opinion on the topic of your chosen question, but, again, this opinion should be offered a reasoned defence. One way to do this is to anticipate and address any obvious objections to it. (This is the point of the fifth of the evaluation criteria – “Objections”.) Again, it is (highly) recommended that your consult the evaluation criteria in writing your assignment.
Evaluation Criteria:(Please note that on the peer assessment submission page these criteria have a slightly different format, where (a) = (1), (b) = (2), etc., and (1) or (2) correspond to the marks you would give an assignment you are evaluating for each criterion you are evaluating it on, where the higher the mark the better.) 1.
Layout: does the assignment have a clear introduction and conclusion? Does each part of the assignment have a clearly indicated purpose?a.
No introduction or conclusion. No indication of the purposes for each part of the assignment.b.
The assignment has an introduction and presents conclusions. The purposes of each part of the assignment are fairly clear.c.
The assignment has a clear introduction and conclusion. All the parts have a clear purpose that contributes to the argument.2.
Structure: is a clear philosophical position or thesis stated? Are arguments offered in support?a.
No clear position or thesis is stated. No arguments are presented.b.
Fairly clear statement of a position or thesis. Arg some lack of clarity about how they support the position/thesis.c.
Clear statement of a position or thesis. Arguments are presented. It is clear how the arguments support the position/thesis offered.3.
Argument: is the argument clear and coherent? Is the argument convincing?a.
No clearly presented argument or the argument is extremely incoherent.b.
There is an argument that is clearly presented, but has some incoherence.c.
There is a clearly presented argument that does not suffer from incoherence.4.
Addressing the question: does the assignment address the question being asked?a.
The assignment does not address the question at all.b.
Most of the assignment is clearly relevant to addressing the question being asked.c.
All of the assignment is clearly relevant to addressing the question being asked.5.
Objections: does the assignment anticipate and address obvious objections to the argument?a.
Obvious objections to the argument presented are completely overlooked.b.
Obvious objections to the argument are anticipated. They are addressed only partially, or with some lack of clarity.c.
Obvious objections to the argument are anticipated. They are clearly and fully addressed.6.
Engaging with the material: does the assignment show engagement with the relevant lecture material?a.
There is little or no engagement with the lecture material.b.
There is engagement with the lecture material, but the material might be superficially discussed.c.
There is clear engagement with the lecture material, which is attentively discussed.7.
Understanding the material: does the assignment show clear understanding of the relevant lecture material?a.
The assignment does not show understanding of any of the lecture material, or shows misunderstanding of the material.b.
The assignment shows some understanding, although some relevant aspects of the material may be missing or misunderstood.c.
The assignment shows good understanding of all the relevant lecture material. You will also be asked for the following for each assignment you evaluate:8.
General feedback (maximum 500 words): do you have any additional comments for the author?a.
What do you think were the main strengths of this assignment?b.
What do you think were the most important ways it could have been improved? Good luck with your assignments!The Introduction to Philosophy Team. 6votes received.
呃，看不懂的话写不就更麻烦了吗？只要完成quiz就可以拿证书，写不写无所谓。大概就是说，你从14个题目里面选一个题目，750字，引用不可以超过75字。11月10号之前交，然后至少要评价两位同学的。下面那些是评分标准。
引用 的话：呃，看不懂的话写不就更麻烦了吗？只要完成quiz就可以拿证书，写不写无所谓。大概就是说，你从14个题目里面选一个题目，750字，引用不可以超过75字。11月10号之前交，然后至少要评价两位同学的。下面...哦哦
quiz已完成
14个题目大致翻译如下：W1：哲学经常被视为是一种对于现实和我们所在的一种反思，不过科学也研究这些问题并给出了令人印象深刻的结果，那么为什么我们要用哲学去思考这些问题？Wards老师对于哲学的定义是否让你信服，有没有一种right way of thinking about things？W2：如果知识不是被合理辩护的真信念，我们如何去满足那两个anti-luck intuition？如果我们不能排除怀疑主义的观点，我们能否认识关于这个世界的任何知识？W3： John Searle的「中文房间」问题试图论证什么？它在这一意图上成功了吗？计算机能否有思维？W4：relativism是不是objectivism的一种形式？我们应不应该成为道德上的相对主义者？W5：论述intellectual autonomy和intellectual solidarity的优缺点。Hume关于一个人不应该在他人证言基础上相信奇迹的论证是否正确？W6：你对inference to the best explanation有什么观点、想法？有没有一些好的理由去认为科学理论应该是真实的而非仅仅满足我们的经验？W7：解释David Lewis关于Causal Loops的观点。时间旅行在逻辑上是否可行？为了理解题目最好还是理解英文好一点。总的来说这些题目相当的简单，不过英文显然是硬伤。。必须用英文，且是一个完整的Argument。英语翻译Directions:For this part,you are allowed 30 minutes to write a composition on the topic My Opinion on Advertisement.You should write at least 120 words and you should base your composition on the outline below:Some people hold the idea th_百度作业帮
英语翻译Directions:For this part,you are allowed 30 minutes to write a composition on the topic My Opinion on Advertisement.You should write at least 120 words and you should base your composition on the outline below:Some people hold the idea th
英语翻译Directions:For this part,you are allowed 30 minutes to write a composition on the topic My Opinion on Advertisement.You should write at least 120 words and you should base your composition on the outline below:Some people hold the idea that the advertisement is a necessary evil in modern life.What do you think?My Opinion on Advertisement As is known to all,angels and evils are poles apart.But is there anything that combines the two perfectly?Some there is-the advertisement.With the growing influence of mass media,advertising invades every aspect of our lives.Whenever we turn on the TV,look through a newspaper,open the mailbox,or surf on the Internet,advertisements would immediately jump into our sight.As they make things so attractive,we often end up buying things that we do not really need.Advertising not only adds to the price of the goods,thus harming the consumer's interest,but also imposes a kind of materialistic value upon the audience.But that is only part of the story-advertisements are informative as well as persuasive.They provide us with up-to-date information about the latest products.Some advertisements are so elegantly presented that we are inspired or even moved.No matter it is an evil or an angel,advertisement has become an indispensable part of our modern life.
在这个部分,你有30分钟的时间写一篇有关“我对广告的看法”的作文.你的作文需根据以下要点至少120字：有人认为,广告在现代生活中就像是一个必须的魔鬼.你怎么认为?我对广告的看法如所有人所知道,天使和魔鬼是两个极端.但是否存在能够完美联系这两者的东西呢?也许广告可以.随着大众传媒的发展,广告“侵略”着我们生活的方方面面.无论何时当我们打开电视,看报,打开邮箱或是浏览因特网,广告就会立刻跳入我们的视线.正因为它们将事物美化得极具吸引力,我们最终常会买一些我们实际上并不需要的东西.广告不仅使得产品价格上升以致减弱顾客的兴趣,还会欺骗观众的某种价值观.但这仅仅是广告的一部分,它们不仅具有劝诱性,还有情报性.它们为我们提供新产品的最新信息.有些广告呈现得那么优美而使我们被激励甚至感动.不管它是恶魔还是天使,广告已成为我们现代生活不可缺少的部分.
指导：在这个环节，你将会有30分钟时间来完成一篇主题是关于：”我对广告的看法”的文章．文章不少于120字，以下面的概括性语言为基础 一些人认为广告在现代生活中是必需的不幸，你是怎么想的呢？ 我对广告的看法正如大家知道的，好和坏都是极地的两端．但是有什么是他们两的完美结合呢？那就是广告．随着媒体影响的增强，广告侵占渗透了我们生活的每一个方面．无论是当...英语翻译The utilization of low-value and low-grade hardwood material is a recurrent concern in forest products research.This paper clarifies and expands on this topic and provides a frame work to help researchers isolate specific researchable pro_百度作业帮
英语翻译The utilization of low-value and low-grade hardwood material is a recurrent concern in forest products research.This paper clarifies and expands on this topic and provides a frame work to help researchers isolate specific researchable pro
英语翻译The utilization of low-value and low-grade hardwood material is a recurrent concern in forest products research.This paper clarifies and expands on this topic and provides a frame work to help researchers isolate specific researchable problem
对低值低级硬木材料的利用是在林产品研究领域被反复关注的一个问题.本论文阐述并扩展了该课题,并提供了一个基本框架以助研究者分离出特定研究课题.Our-opinions-are-divided-on-thistopic
我们的意见分歧对本课题
此结果来自百度翻译，长句或段落建议您使用
1. For what do we live, but to make sport for our neighbours, and laugh at them in our turn?
我们活着是为了什么？不就是给邻居当笑柄，再反过来笑他们。
来自《傲慢与偏见》
2. Our tour prices bore little resemblance to those in the holiday brochures.
我们的旅游报价和那些度假手册里的价格相去甚远。
来自柯林斯例句
3. Most of our flights have a baggage allowance of 44lbs per passenger.
我们大多数航班行李限重为每位乘客44磅。
来自柯林斯例句
4. It is important that we dovetail our respective interests.
让我们各自的利益相吻合很重要。
来自柯林斯例句
5. Our cars get blocked in and we can't leave for ages.
我们的车被堵在里面，要等很久才能走。
来自柯林斯例句
0){var rand = parseInt(Math.random() * (000)+100000);top.location.href='/'+encodeURIComponent(document.getElementById('s').value.trim().replace( / /g, '_'))+'?renovate='+}else{top.location.href='/'+encodeURIComponent(document.getElementById('s').value.trim().replace( / /g, '_'));};}" action="/">
查过的词自动加入生词本
Tip：此功能设置只能在登录状态下生效
Our-opinions-are-divided-on-thistopic
需要改进的内容：
单词大小写
其他（请在下面补充描述）
错误描述：
您还可在这里补充说明下 O(∩_∩)O~
方便的话，请您留下一种联系方式，便于问题的解决：