Who is the man _____ is standing there?这里要用which 还是用 that?为什么?
that当主句的主语是疑问词who或which时 只用thate.g. which is the bike that you lost?
为您推荐：
其他类似问题
扫描下载二维码—Who is standing under the tree? —_____.
A. Tom are
C. Tom does
1. 因为他背痛，所以没来学校。
He didn"t come to school __________ __________ his __________ __________.2. 直到妈妈回来我才停止看电视。
I __________ __________ __________ TV __________ my mother came back.3. 请你铺好床，好吗?
__________ you __________ __________ your __________?4. 我想找一份做工程师的工作，同时找一份兼职工作。
I want to find a job __________ an engineer, and get a part-time job __________
__________ __________ __________. 5. 最有创造力的演员是谁?
Who is the __________ __________ actor?
_____ isn"t easy to learn a foreign language well. But don"t give it up.
______ is true that we can"t live happily without friends" help.
高考全年学习规划
该知识易错题
该知识点相似题
高考英语全年学习规划讲师：李辉
更多高考学习规划：
客服电话：400-676-2300
京ICP证050421号&京ICP备号 &京公安备110-1081940& 网络视听许可证0110531号
旗下成员公司Do you know the girl_____is standing under the tree?A whom B who C whose D which 选什么?为什么?
B先行词girl是人,用who
为您推荐：
其他类似问题
B，由B引导的宾语从句
扫描下载二维码Top Leaderboard, Site wide
Left Masthead
By Eugene Robinson
By Nicholas J. Cull
By Thomas Frank / TomDispatch
By Ron Charles
By Ron Kovic
By Louise Rubacky
By Lauren Maples
By Tony Platt
By John Gray
Thank You for Standing Up
I spent Friday morning sitting on a wooden bench in a fourth-floor courtroom in the New York Criminal Court in Manhattan. I was waiting to be sentenced for “disturbing the peace” and “refusing to obey a lawful order” during an Occupy demonstration in front of Goldman Sachs in November.
Those sentenced before me constituted the usual fare of the court. They were poor people of color accused of mostly petty crimes—drug possession, thefts, shoplifting, trespassing because they were homeless and needed a place to sleep, inappropriate touching, grand larceny and violation of probation. They were escorted out of a backroom by a police officer, stood meekly before the judge with their hands cuffed behind them, were hastily defended by a lawyer clutching a few folders, and were sentenced. Ten days in jail. Sixty days in jail. Six months in jail. A steady stream of convictions.& My sentence, by comparison, was slight. I was given an ACD, or “adjournment in contemplation of dismissal,” which means that if I am not arrested in the next six months my case is dismissed. If I am arrested during this period of informal probation the old charge will be added to the new one before I am sentenced.
The country’s most egregious criminals, the ones who had stripped some of those being sentenced of their homes, their right to a decent education and health care, their jobs, their dignity and their hope, those wallowing in tens and hundreds of millions of dollars, those who had gamed the system to enrich themselves at our expense, were doing the dirty business of speculation in the tall office towers a few blocks away. They were making money. A few of these wealthy plutocrats were with the president, who was in New York that day to attend four fundraisers that took in an estimated $3 million. For $15,000 you could have joined Barack Obama at Daniel, an exclusive Upper East Side restaurant. For $35,000 you could have been at a gathering hosted by movie director Spike Lee. Most of those sentenced in that courtroom do not make that much in a year. It was a good day in New York for Barack Obama. It was a bad day for us.
Our electoral system, already hostage to corporate money and corporate lobbyists, gasped its last two years ago. It died on Jan. 21, 2010, when the Supreme Court in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission granted to corporations the right to spend unlimited amounts on independent political campaigns. The ruling turned politicians into corporate employees. If any politician steps out of line, dares to defy corporate demands, this ruling hands to our corporate overlords the ability to pump massive amounts of anonymous money into campaigns to make sure the wayward are defeated and silenced. Politicians like Obama are hostages. They jump when corporations say jump. They beg when corporations say beg. They hand corporations exemptions, subsidies, trillions in taxpayer money, no-bid contracts and massive loans with virtually no interest, and they abolish any regulations that impede profits and protect the citizen. Corporations like Goldman Sachs, because they own the system, are bailed out by federal dollars and given essentially free government loans to gamble. I am not sure what to call our economic system, but it is not capitalism. And if any elected official so much as murmurs anything that sounds like dissent, the Supreme Court ruling permits corporations to destroy him or her. And they do.
Turn off your televisions. Ignore the Newt-Mitt-Rick-Barack reality show. It is as relevant to your life as the gossip on “Jersey Shore.” The real debate, the debate raised by the Occupy movement about inequality, corporate malfeasance, the destruction of the ecosystem, and the security and surveillance state, is the only debate that matters. You won’t hear it on the corporate-owned airwaves and cable networks, including MSNBC, which has become to the Democratic Party what Fox News is to the lunatic fringe of the Republican Party. You won’t hear it on NPR or PBS. You won’t read about it in our major newspapers. The issues that matter are being debated, however, on
Link TV, The Real News, Occupy websites and Revolution Truth. They are being raised by journalists such as Glenn Greenwald and Matt Taibbi. You can find genuine ideas in corners of the Internet or in books by political philosophers such as . But you have to go looking for them.&
Advertisement
Square, Site wide
Voting will not alter the corporate systems of power. Voting is an act of political theater. Voting in the United States is as futile and sterile as in the elections I covered as a reporter in dictatorships like Syria, Iran and Iraq. There were always opposition candidates offered up by these dictatorships. Give the people the illusion of choice. Throw up the pretense of debate. Let the power elite hold public celebrations to exalt the triumph of popular will. We can vote for Romney or Obama, but Goldman Sachs and ExxonMobil and Bank of America and the defense contractors always win. There is little difference between our electoral charade and the ones endured by the Syrians and Iranians. Do we really believe that Obama has, or ever had, any intention to change the culture in Washington?
In this year’s presidential election I will vote for a third-party candidate, either the Green Party candidate or , assuming one of them makes it onto the ballot in New Jersey, but voting is nothing more than a brief chance to register our disgust with the corporate state. It will not alter the configurations of power. The campaign is not worth our emotional, physical or intellectual energy.
A collection of Truthdig Columns by Chris Hedges
Keep up with Chris Hedges’ latest columns, interviews, tour dates and more at .
Related Entries
Get truth delivered to
your inbox every day.
New and Improved Comments
If you have trouble leaving a comment, review . Still having problems? . If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our .
Please enable JavaScript to view the
Page 1 of 2 pages &1&&
Right 1, Site wide - BlogAds Premium
Right 2, Site wide - Blogads
Right Skyscraper, Site Wide
Right Internal Skyscraper, Site wide
& 2016 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.
Like Truthdig on Facebook