responsibility是什么意思，词典释义与在线翻译：
责任，职责，任务
负担，担子
责任感，责任心
义务履行能力
【无线电】响应性
职务，岗位
[U]责任 the condition or quality of being responsible
[U]责任感,可信赖性 the quality of being sensible and trustworthy
[C]职责,所负责任的事 sth for which one is responsible
提示：各行业词典APP中含有本词条的独家正版内容，在手机上可看到更多释义内容。
responsibili&:&责任 ...
在&&中查看更多...
responsibili&:&责任，职责 ...
在&&中查看更多...
responsibili&:&响 ...
在&&中查看更多...
responsibili&:&责任, ...
在&&中查看更多...
responsibili&:&职责 ...
在&&中查看更多...
responsibili&:&责任, ...
在&&中查看更多...
responsibili&:&责任 ...
在&&中查看更多...
the social force that binds you to the courses of action de
"we must instill a sense of duty in our children"
"every right impl every opportunity, every possession, a duty"
the proper sphere or exten
"it was his province to take care of himself"
a for the trait of being answerable to someone for something or being responsible for one'
"he holds a position of great responsibility"
responsibility的用法和样例：
用作名词 (n.)
It's my responsibility to lock the doors.
我负责锁门。
You can't retreat from the responsibility in this affair.
你不能回避在这一事件中的责任。
The prescription of drugs is a doctor's responsibility.
开药方是医生的职责。
He is free from any sense of responsibility.
他丝毫没有责任感。
Our teacher has a high degree of responsibility.
我们老师有高度的责任感。
用作名词 (n.)
He has no responsibility for that accident.
他对那个事故没有责任。
Wives still take most of the responsibility for the children.
妻子仍然对孩子承担大部分责任。
The father of a family should have more sense of responsibility.
一家之父应有责任感。
Do you know the responsibilities of the government workers?
你知道政府工作人员的职责吗?
She has a lot of household responsibilities to do every day.
她每天有数不清的家务事要去做。
用作名词 (n.)
lay the responsibility at sb's door
把责任归于某人attribute duty to sb
With so many reports to mislead one, it is hard to say at whose door the responsibility should be laid.
报告多得摸不着头绪,很难说责任该由谁负。
on one's responsibility
主动地,自作主张地sth be decided by oneself
He did the good deed on his responsibility.
他主动做了那件好事。
You can't do it on your responsibility.
你不能自作主张地做那件事。
shake one's responsibility
摆脱责任get rid of duty
We all couldn't shake our responsibilities.
我们都不能摆脱责任。
shift the responsibility onto
嫁祸于人transfer the misfortune onto sb
Much of the responsibility for the disaster was shifted onto John, and this was quite undeserved.
把这场灾难的大部分责任推到约翰身上,这太不公平了。
自作主张地
担负起责任
单独承担的责任...
权责单位会计制,责任...
[经] 双重责任...
峰值负载供电量,峰值...
[经] 保管责任...
责任成本会计...
I had the responsibility of looking after her.
出自：J. Frame
I have responsibilities towards both passengers and crew.
出自：A. MacLean
responsibility的详细讲解：
responsibility, obligation
obligation仅指对他人应尽的职责和义务,没有对自己应尽的责任的含意; responsibility则指一个人必须对后果负责的职责或义务。
obligation
responsibility
这些名词都有“义务”或“职责”之意。
:duty指按道德和法律的标准，一个人永远要尽的义务，强调自觉性。
:obligation指道义上或法律上对他人的义务，强调强制性。也指因作出承诺而被迫履行的某种义务。
:responsibility指任何义务、职责、责任或职务上所应尽的本分，强调对他人的责任。
:function指因职务或职业关系去履行某种职责。
responsibility的海词问答与网友补充：
responsibility的相关资料：
responsibili&:&责任， 责 ...
在&&中查看更多...
responsibili&:&责任,职责 ...
在&&中查看更多...
【同义词】
responsibili:responsibility n. 责任, 职责习惯用语be relieved of one's responsibility [-ties] (被)解除职责bear responsibility f…
相关词典网站：trait是什么意思
泽田27丶TA偝
trait D.J.[treit] K.K.[tret] n.人的个性, 显著的特点, 特征His generosity is one of his good traits.慷慨大方是他的好品质之一.
为您推荐：
其他类似问题
扫描下载二维码Trait Theories
Trait Theories of Personality
Dr. C. George Boeree
A trait is what we call a characteristic way in which an
individual
perceives, feels, believes, or acts.& When we casually describe
we are likely to use trait terms:& I am, for example, somewhat of
an introvert, a pretty nervous person, strongly attached to my family,
frequently depressed, and awesomely
intelligent.&
I have a good sense of humor, fond of languages, very fond of good
not at all fond of exercise, and a little obsessive.& You
I have just given you ten traits that actually go a long way towards
describing
Psychologists, especially personologists, are very interested in
They are especially interested in finding which traits are broad and
genetically based, as opposed to ones that are rather peculiar and
can change
easily.& Over the years, we have had a number of theories that
to describe the key traits of human beings.
Carl Jung and the Myers-Briggs
One of the earliest trait theories was introduced by a colleague of
Sigmund Freud's by the name of Carl Jung.& Jung was never
completely
sold on Freud's ideas, and soon left his circle to develop his own
theory.& This is not the place to go into details, but one aspect
of the theory concerned traits that Jung felt were inborn.& These
inborn, genetically determined traits are usually called temperaments.
Later, two students of Jung's theory named Myers and Briggs -
and daughter - developed a personality test based on Jung's
temperaments
called the Myers-Briggs Type Inventory, or MBTI.& It has gone on
become the most famous personality test of all time.
The traits are seen as opposites, and the first set is introversion
and extraversion.& Introversion refers to a tendency to
the world inside oneself.& The more obvious aspects of
introversion
are shyness, a distaste for social functions, and a love of privacy.
Extraversion is the tendency to look to the outside world,
especially
people, for one's pleasures.& Extraverts are usually outgoing and
they enjoy social activities, but they don't like to be
The majority of people in the world are extraverts, so introverts
feel a bit out of it.& A society like ours is very pro-extravert,
to the point of seeing introversion as abnormal and shy people in need
of therapy!& There are some cultures, however, that see extraverts
as the oddballs. We should note that it was Jung who first used the
introversion and extraversion!
Jung believed that introversion-extraversion was either-or. You are
born one or the other and remain that way for the rest of your
life.& Now you could, as an introvert, learn to behave more like
an extravert, or, as an extravert, learn to behave more like an
introvert.& But you can't really switch.& If this is true,
that would suggest that introversion-extraversion is determined by a
single gene, something that is pretty unusual even for more physical
differences!& Nevertheless, it seems that
introversion-extraversion is a very significant and fairly stable trait.
Next, we have the contrast between sensing people and intuiting
Sensing types, as the name implies, get all their information
life from their senses.& They tend to be realistic, down-to-earth
people, but they tend to see everything in rather simplistic,
black-or-white terms.
Intuiting people tend to get their information from
intuition.&
This means that they tend to be a little out of touch with the more
aspects of reality - a little "flakey", you might say - but may see
big picture" behind the details better.& Intuiting people are
artistic and can be rather philosophical.
Again, the majority of people are sensing, and that can make
feel rather lonely and under-appreciated.& Our society tends to be
distrustful
of dreamers, artists, and intellectuals - but other societies may be
appreciative.
Next, there's the contrast between thinkers and feelers.& Thinking
people make their decisions on the basis of thinking - reasoning,
logic, step-by-step problem solving. This works very well for physical
problems, but can leave something to be desired when dealing with
as complex as people.
Feeling people make their decisions based on their
feelings.&
While this doesn't work so well when trying to fix you car or your
feelings are a kind of intuition that works very well when dealing with
Half of all people are thinking and half are feeling, but the
proportions
differ when we start looking at gender:& The majority of men are
and the majority of women are feelers.& This goes along well with
old stereotypes as well as recent research:& Men tend to do better
with step-by-step problem solving, especially involving mechanical
Women tend to do better in social situations.& Some people have
criticized
Jung for this apparent sexism, but we should note that a good third of
men are feelers, and a good third of women are thinkers, so it is not a
simple "men vs. women" kind of thing.& Plus, Jung said that there
is no reason to value thinking over feeling - each has its strengths
weaknesses.& Note also that feeling men may feel odd, as may
women.& Stereotypes do the greatest harm when they prevent
individuals
from being what they in fact are!
The last contrast is judging versus perceiving.& Judging
people tend to be more like Freud's anal retentive types - neat,
hardworking, always on time, scheduling things very carefully.&
professors tend to be judging!
Perceiving people are more spontaneous.& They prefer to
do things as the spirit moves them.& They are probably more fun
the judging types but, as you can imagine, they tend not to get things
done. It often seems to us college professors that college students are
all perceiving.
Actually, the distribution of judging and perceiving people is
even - 50-50.
When you take the Myers-Briggs or similar tests like the Keirsey,
get a set of four letters:& I for introvert or E for extravert, S
for sensing or N for intuiting, T for thinking or F for feeling, and J
for judging or P for perceiving.& I, for example, am an INFP,
is in fact quite accurate.& My wife is an ISFJ -- she is more
down-to-earth
and organized than I will ever be.& That's why she controls the
finances!& On the other hand, we are both introverted and feeling,
which means that you are more likely to find us crying over a rented
than out at some wild party!
Hans Eysenck
Hans Eysenck was the first psychologist to make this trait or
temperament
business into something more mathematical:& He gave long lists of
adjectives to hundreds of thousands of people and used a special
statistics
called factor analysis to
figure out what factors -
trait dimensions -
carry the most weight.& He took the results of this work and
a test called the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (EPQ).
Instead of making these traits either-or, like Jung did, he saw them
as dimensions.& His first trait dimension was, like Jung, extraversion-introversion.&
But rather than say you were one or the other (an I or an E), he gave
a score on extraversion-introversion:& A low score meant you were
introverted, a high score extraverted.& Of course, this meant you
could be halfway in-between - as in fact most people are!
His second trait dimension he called neuroticism.& If
scored high on this scale, that meant you tended to be a very nervous,
emotional sort of person.& While it doesn't mean you are
necessarily
a neurotic, it does mean you are more likely to develop neurotic
such as phobias, obsessions, compulsions, and depression than someone
who scores
Low neuroticism is nowadays often called emotional stability.
The third dimension is called psychoticism.& He added
later in his research, after he had gotten more data from people who
in mental institutions.& As the name implies, these are people
tendencies to psychosis, meaning that they are more likely to have
dealing with reality.& Psychotic people sometimes have
hallucinations
and often have delusions such as odd beliefs about being watched,
by the CIA or even by creatures from other planets.& A middle
on psychoticism might mean that you are a bit eccentric or that you
risks that other people aren't as likely to take.& A low score
that you are pretty normal in this regard.
Eysenck's research gets a great deal of respect, and most
psychologists
see his theory as on the right track.
The Big Five
More recently, a number of researchers have been using the latest in
computer technology to redo the work that Eysenck and other earlier
researchers
did in far more laborious ways.& This has lead to what is known as
the "big five" or the "five factor" theory.
The first dimension is, again, extraversion-introversion.
The second is usually called emotional stability, and is
the reverse of Eysenck's neuroticism.
The third is called agreeableness.& A high score means
you tend to be friendly and accommodating - a nice person.& You
need to be extraverted:& I am an introvert, but I score high on
agreeableness.&
If you score low, you are likely to be more idiosyncratic and have
getting along with people.& This is not entirely negative:&
people often get their nice reputation by by conforming and
compromising
on their principles, while non-agreeable people are more likely to
to what they think is right even if it's unpopular.& Then again,
are just plain disagreeable!
The fourth is conscientiousness.& This parallels
with Jung's judging-perceiving.& People who score high on
conscientiousness
are orderly, get their work done, arrive on time, and care about doing
things right.& Score low on conscientiousness and that probably
you tend to slack off on your work, rarely worry about deadlines or
and are more interested in taking it easy.
The fifth has come with several different labels, such as culture,
openness to experience, or just openness.& If you
high on openness, you are more likely to enjoy cultural pursuits such
art, music, dance.& You are more likely to go to museums, the
the ballet.& You are more likely to want to travel to exotic
and meet people different from yourself.& You are more open to new
experiences, such as trying foods you've never tried before or
to music from all over the world.& You are more likely to be
interested
in reading about philosophies and religions other than your own,
so on.& If you score low, you are more likely to seek out the
McDonalds,
even when you are in Paris or Bangkok.
These five have stood up so well to research that I suspect most
psychologists
today accept them, at least until something even better comes
It is also becoming clear that these are in fact strongly influenced by
genetics.& In other words, you are born with at least the general
outline of your personality traits already laid out for you.& That
doesn't mean you can't change - it just means that it is less likely
more difficult.
& Copyright , C. George Boeree求英语作文一篇~！！急求~！！跪求~！！题目如下~_百度知道