1.Tom,I want to have some milk Th1.Tom,I want to have some milkThere’s ______ left.What about juice?few B.much c.noneA2I don’t know what _____- if I do thatErr,I think you ____ tell him the wholeshould B.should C,_百度作业帮
1.Tom,I want to have some milk Th1.Tom,I want to have some milkThere’s ______ left.What about juice?few B.much c.noneA2I don’t know what _____- if I do thatErr,I think you ____ tell him the wholeshould B.should C,
1.Tom,I want to have some milk Th1.Tom,I want to have some milkThere’s ______ left.What about juice?few B.much c.noneA2I don’t know what _____- if I do thatErr,I think you ____ tell him the whole thing first should B.should C,should’tBIt is dangerous to swim here.Look at the sighOh,I ____ see it.Thanks for ____ mehaven’t;telling B.didn’t;telling C.don’t;tellingBShanghai is bigger then ______ in ChinaYear,and it is one of ______ in the worldA.the beautiful cityB.the beautiful cityC.the most beautiful cityA
第一个 和最后一个错了 第一个选择C few 修饰可数名词 最后一个 选择C 第二空 最高级当前位置：
＞＞＞As I know, there is ____ car in this neighborhood.A．no aB．n..
As I know, there is ____ car in this neighborhood.A．no aB．no suchC．not suchD．no such a
题型：单选题难度：偏易来源：不详
B试题分析：句意为：据我所知，在这附近没有这样的车。在句中no ="not" a, 即no such car ="not" such a car.所以There is no such car="There" is not such a car. 故答案应为B。
马上分享给同学
据魔方格专家权威分析，试题“As I know, there is ____ car in this neighborhood.A．no aB．n..”主要考查你对&&there be句型&&等考点的理解。关于这些考点的“档案”如下：
现在没空？点击收藏，以后再看。
因为篇幅有限，只列出部分考点，详细请访问。
there be句型
there be句型的概念：
英语中的there be结构主要表示某处存在有某物，所以通常被称为存在句。其中的there为引导词，无词义，be为谓语动词，therebe后面的名词为句子主语。therebe结构的否定式和疑问式：
&1、否定式：there be结构的否定式通常应将否定词置于动词be之后： 如：There is not any bread left. 没有一点面包了。 &&&&&&& There isn't anything I can do for you. 我帮不了你什么忙。若谓语中包括有助动词或情态动词，通常将否定词置于助动词与情态动词之后： 如：There can't be so many mistakes. 不可能有那么多错误。 &&&&&&& There shouldn't be any doubt about it. 对此不应有什么怀疑。 &&&&&&& There haven't been any parties in weeks. 好几个礼拜没开过晚会了。另外注意以下类型的否定式： 如：There doesn't seem to have been any difficulty over the money question. 在钱的问题上似乎没发生什么困难。 2、疑问式：there be结构的疑问式通常应将否定词置于动词be之后： 如：Is there any good film on? 映什么好电影吗? &&&&&&& Is there room for me in the car? 车子里还有我坐的地方吗? &&&&&&& Are there any letters for me? 有我的信吗? 若谓语中包括有助动词或情态动词，通常将助动词或情态动词移至句首构成疑问式： 如：Has there been an accident? 出事了吗? &&&&&&& Have there been any new developments? 有什么新的发展吗? &&&&&&& Can there have been so much rain there？那儿会下过那么多雨吗？另外注意以下类型的疑问式： 如：Uncle Jesse, why do there have to be poor people like those? 杰西叔，为什么一定要有他们那样的穷人? there be结构的谓语形式：1、主谓一致问题：&若只有一个主语，谓语的数则取决于该主语的数；若有几个主语并列，则通常是与靠近的主语保持一致： 如：There is a man at the door. 门口有个人。 &&&&&&& There are some girls in the room. 房间里有几个女孩。 &&&&&&& There is a pen and some books on the desk. 桌上有一支钢笔和一些书。 2、时态问题：there be结构的时态由其中的谓语动词be来体现，它可以有一般现在时、一般将来时、一般过去时、现在完成时以及过去完成时等多种时态形式： 如：There is going to be[will be] an English film tonight. 今晚将有一场英语电影。 &&&&&&& There was a lot to be done. 有很多事要做。 &&&&&&& There were some children swimming in the river. 有些小孩在河里游泳。 &&&&&&& There have been many such accidents. 已发生了好几起那样的事故。 &&&&&&& There had been two seafights between them. 他们之间发生了两场海战。 3、与情态动词连用：there be结构有时可以与情态动词连用： 如：There may be a storm tomorrow. 明天可能有风暴。 &&&&&&& There used to be a hospital here. 原来这里有家医院。 &&&&&&& He felt there must be something wrong. 他感到准有什么问题。 &&&&&&& There might still be hope. 可能还有希望。 &&&&&&& There ought to be a comma here. 这儿应有一个逗号。 4、动词be换成其他动词：有时可将there be中的动词：be换为live, remain, seem, appear, exist, stand, lie, come等： 如：Once upon a time there lived a man known by the name of Joe Beef. 从前有个人名叫乔·比夫。&&&&&&&&&There seems[appears] something the matter with her. 她好像是出了什么事似的。 &&&&&&& There existed different opinions on this problem. 对这个问题曾有不同看法。 &&&&&&& There remained just twenty-eight pounds. 只剩28英镑了。 &&&&&&& At the top of the hill there stands an old temple. 在小山顶上有一座古庙。 5、与其他动词搭配使用：there be结构有时可与其他动词搭配使用，构成一种复合谓语： 如：There seemed to be nobody about, so I went in. 附近似乎没有人，因此我就走了进去。 &&&&&&& There happened to be a man walking by. 恰好有一个人从旁经过。
therebe结构的非谓语形式： 基本结构：there be结构的非谓语形式有两种基本结构，即there being和there to be：1、there being结构该结构的主要用法有： (1)用作状语： 如：There being nothing else to do, we went home. 由于没什么其他的事要干，所以我们就回家了。 &&&&&&& There having been no rain, the ground was dry. 由于没有下雨，所以地面很干。【注】有时可与状语从句转换： 如：There being no further business(=As there was no further business), I declared the meeting closed. 由于没有别的事了，我宣布闭会。 (2)用作介词宾语： 如：There is now some hope of there being a settle ment of the dispute. 现在有点希望可以解决这次争端。 2、There to be结构该结构的主要用法有： (1)用作动词宾语：该结构可用作某些动词（如like, prefer, hate, want, mean, intend, expect, consider等）的宾语： 如：I don't want there to be any misunderstanding. 我可不希望有任何误解。 &&&&&&& Students hate there to be too much homework. 学生讨厌做太多的家庭作业。 &&&&&&& We expect there to be more discussion about this. 我们期望能对此展开更多的讨论。【注】在let there be结构中，动词be不带to： 如：Don't let there be any noise. 不允许有任何吵闹。 &&&&&&& Let there be no mistake about it. 这事不要出错。 (2)用作介词for的宾语： 如：They asked for there to be another meeting. 他们要求再开一次会议。【注】用作介词宾语一般用there being，但用作介词for的宾语时，只能用there to be。比较：They planned on there being another meeting. 他们打算再开一次会议。 &&&&&&&&&&& They planned for there to be another meeting. 他们打算再开一次会议。几个重要句型和结构：
&1、There is no doing结构：其意为“不可能…”、“无法…”： 如：There's no denying the fact. 这一事实不容否认。 &&&&&&& There is no getting over the difficulty. 这困难无法克服。 &&&&&&& There is no knowing what he will do next. 无法知道他下一步要干什么。 &&&&&&& There was no telling when she would be back. 没法知道她什么时候回来。 2、There is no difficulty in doing sth结构：意为“做某事没有困难”： 如：There is no difficulty in finding his office. 找到了他的办公室没费一点劲。 &&&&&&& There was no difficulty in carrying out the plan. 执行这项计划没什么困难。 3、There's no doubt…结构：意为“毫无疑问…”： 如：There is no doubt of his success. 毫无疑问他一定会成功。 &&&&&&& There could be no doubt that he was one of the best writer in this country. 毫无疑问他是这个国家最优秀的作家之一。 4、There is no hurry(to do sth)句式：其意为“不用急(于做某事)”： 如：There's no hurry to return the book. 现在不急于还书。 &&&&&&& There's no hurry, so do it slowly and carefully. 不用赶时间，要慢慢细心地做。 5、There's no need for…结构：其意为“不需要或不必要…”： 如：There is no need for help. 不需要帮助。 &&&&&&& There is no need for you to go. 你没有必要去。 6、There is no question about...结构：其意为“…是毫无疑问的”： 如：There's no question about his success. 毫无疑问他会成功。 &&&&&&& There's no question about his honesty. 毫无疑问他是诚实的。 7、There is no question of doing sth句式：其意为“做某事是不可能的”： 如：There is no question of his coming. 他不可能会来。 &&&&&&& There is no question of our arriving on time. 我们不可能准时赶到。 8、There is no sense in doing sth结构：意为“做某事没有道理或好处”： 如：There's no sense in criticizing him. 批评他也没有用。 &&&&&&& There's no sense in waiting three hours. 等三小时是不没有道理的。 9、There's no point in doing sth句式：意为“做某事没有用”： 如：There's no point(in) telling her about it. 告诉她没有用。 如：There's no point in wasting time. 耗时间没用。【注】以上有的结构中的no根据情况也可换成其他限定词： 如：There is some difficulty in doing sth 意为“做某事有些困难”。&&&&&&&&&There is much difficulty in doing sth 意为“做某事许多困难”。 &&&&&&& There's a need for… 意为“需要或有必要…”。 10、“there be＋名词＋动词”结构：（1）there be+宾语+现在分词现在分词表示主动关系，同时表示动作正在进行：如：There is some one waiting for him. 有人在等他。&&&&&&& There was a man standing in front of me. 我前面站着一个男人。&&&&&&& There were some children swimming in the river. 有些小孩在河里游泳。&&&&&&& There were a group of young people working in the fields. 有一群青年在地里劳动。有时现在分词可表示一种状态：如：There's a piano standing against the wall. 靠墙有一架钢琴。&&&&&&& There're a lot of difficulties facing us. 我们面前有很多困难。&&&&&&& There is a door leading to the garden. 有一座门通往花园。有个别现在分词用于该结构时可以表示将来(正如它们可用进行时表示将来一样)：如：There are ten people coming to dinner. 有10个人来吃晚饭。（2）there be+宾语+过去分词过去分词表示一种被动关系，同时表示动作已经发生：如：There is nothing written on it. 上面没写东西。&&&&&&& There were ten people killed in the accident. 事故中有10人丧生。有时过去分词也可表示一种状态(可转换成被动结构)：&&&&&&& There were some old men seated(=who were seated)in the back. 有些老人坐在后面。&&&&&&& There is a red car parked(=which is parked)outside the house. 房子外边停着一辆红色汽车。（3）therebe+宾语+不定式不定式通常表示动作尚未发生：如：There was nobody to look after the child. 没有人照顾这孩子。&&&&&&& There was a large crowd to send him off. 有一大群人要来给他送行。&&&&&&& There was so much to lose that we couldn't take any risks. 可能会有很大的损失，因此我们不能冒险。【注】当其中的宾语与其后的不定式为被动关系时，可用主动表被动，也可用被动式：如：There is much work to do[to be done]. 有许多工作要做。有时其中的不定式为系表结构：&&&&&&& There is nothing to be afraid of. 没什么可怕的。&&&&&&& What was there to be afraid of. 有什么可怕的?&&&&&&& There's nothing to be ashamed of. 没有什么值得羞愧的。
发现相似题
与“As I know, there is ____ car in this neighborhood.A．no aB．n..”考查相似的试题有：
431841411516441422366523361366389210I’m Not Sure There’s a Workable Path for Professional Online Writers & The Dish
//I’m Not Sure There’s a Workable Path for Professional Online&Writers
So it won’t surprise anybody to learn that I really, really don’t like Buzzfeed.
Sometimes, when I consider the Buzzfeed phenomenon, I think I’m living in some sort of fictional satirical world where Buzzfeed is a symbol of how far media can fall. It’s like living in a Douglas Copeland novel. Buzzfeed’s particular brand of lowest common denominator clickbait, their “14 Giraffes Who Totally Look
Like Steve Buscemi,” their “25 Things Only People from [Insert Geographical Area Here] Understand,” their “Which of Fat Cat’s Minions from Chip’n’Dale’s Rescue Rangers Are You?” quizzes, their , sitting side-by-side with their “branded content” like “12 Most Crunchtastic TV Moments Brought to You by Frito Lay,” subsidizing imperial stenographer Rosie Gray’s
(an actual journalist),
powered by an aggregation model that comes pretty close to plagiarism even when it doesn’t devolve into the
of Benny Johnson (thanks and ), in an environment where they can
and think they about it publicly, all lorded over by dumb-faced Ben Smith’s dumb face…. It’s bleak, man. I mean, I can see somebody getting a job offer from Buzzfeed and trying to rationalize it, telling themselves, “well, they’re not so bad….” Yes, they are. They are exactly that bad.
The thing is, I don’t know if there’s some more ethical path writers these days can walk and still end up being able to support themselves. It’s looking pretty grim out there for our professional online writers.
I’m someone who writes a lot of what I guess you would call media criticism. And that means that I’m frequently in the position of saying some not-very-nice things about people who write professionally online. But I criticize because I think t I happen to have some old-fashioned, corny ideas about the role that journalism and political commentary have to play in a democracy such as ours. We need professional writers– not just dedicated amateurs– to observe and comment on our society and our government, in order to ensure that both are functioning the way that they should, and to give our people information they need to make rational political choices. The problem is that the basic economics of that work have become so threatened that I don’t know what independent writers are supposed to do. I hate when talented people join up with outfits like Buzzfeed, which I think are genuinely making our country a stupider place. But I don’t see any clear path that people can take to preserve both their integrity and their ability to eat.
I could, if I was feeling masochistic, run down some of the publications that have recently shuttered or dramatically restructured in a way that has trimmed a lot of talented writers from their payrolls. Sports On Earth, for example, was
in the shouty, gimmicky world of online sports coverage, a place that provided steady work to talented writers like Tomas Rios and Jeb Lund, and which was willing to take a chance on genuinely unique work in a media world growing ever-more homogenous. Or look at
of The American Prospect, for decades an incubator of young liberal writing talent. TAP has prestige and it has a legacy, but you can’t pay the bills with either of those.
was always controversial, but everyone has to recognize that it was a bold attempt at producing real journalism with a new and unique funding model. But that model fell through. For awhile, there was a lot of hype about how hyper-local reporting would be the next wave in web publishing, but AOL’s massive Patch effort crashed and burned. Well,
a “new, nimble company,” and profitable– thanks in large measure to laying off 85% of its news staff. Even that mild success stems from putting a lot of people out of work.
There are way too many great writers– people like Lund and the brilliant and provocative
and others– who don’t have a steady, secure gig that can keep them doing what they do best.
The basic economics of all of this are truly discouraging. Many people who are able to scratch out a living as professional writers have to do so with content mill writing, churning out four or five or six or more posts a day, sometimes for as little as $15 a post. Many have their pay tied to performance incentives, based on clicks, essentially mandating that people play the clickbait game if they want to pay the rent. The importance of Search Engine Optimization may be fading but the days of Please Facebook Favor My Post in Your Algorithm are in full bloom, and if anything that master is even less knowable than Google ever was. Freelancers might get $500 or $1000 for a strong, researched, reported story. That might sound like a lot, but when you’ve spot months conceiving, researching, reporting, and writing that piece, the math is dismal. Clearly, getting a job as an editor or staff writer at a deep-pocketed publication is best, and there’s no substitute for that kind of security. But I think people would be amazed at how little those positions sometimes pay, and they often require living in New York, DC, or Los Angeles, three ludicrously expensive places to live. I know people who work for well-known, national magazines, the kind of jobs thousands of young journos and writers want to work for, who still have to work on the side doing copy writing to make ends meet. And they’re the lucky ones.
There are some people who enjoy the blessing of working under a patronage model, where someone or some institution with deep pockets can afford to subsidize work that isn’t meant to pay for itself. But most writers simply have to chase clicks if they want to survive. What that means is that even the most independent writers tend to chase the same stories, writing post after post about Robin Williams or the ALS Ice Bucket Challenge, knowing that those stories can succeed because they have succeeded already. That makes online writing a brutally homogeneous affair. Choire Sicha– who I think has as much integrity as anybody, although I’m sure he’d roll his eyes at that–
recently, saying:
I do not read a lot of things anymore. A lot of us don’t, we sort of go where the tide takes us. I feel weird about that. I opened up my Digg reader the other day, because I was on blogging duty at work, and everything was so duplicative of each other. I was like, yeah, okay, there’s that piece of news filtering through all these different websites, all the same things… no wonder I don’t go to them. I need to make a new folder in my Digg reader, I guess, that’s “Things That Are Surprising and Interesting and Maybe Weird.” It’s sort of… it’s not… I don’t know, something’s wrong.
That is hardly an experience unique to him. I posted a photo of a cluster of Slate stories about Robin Williams to my Facebook, a half-dozen different angles from the same website about the same dead celebrity. But I could have done the same thing with any number of other websites.
You probably know the causes by now. Even if you don’t believe in the
thesis, you’ve got the essential problem that with so many websites and the ever-growing number of ads on social media like Facebook and Twitter, all competing with the Google behemoth, you’ve got a nearly limitless supply of online advertising, inevitably pushing down the value of ads. Sites have responded by coming up with new and innovative ways to fool readers into thinking ads are legitimate stories. We laughed at the Atlantic , but they were just a little ahead of the curve. We’re starting to see more and more attempts at direct monetization, with paywalls and subscription services, which is great. I hope they succeed. But the idea that online content has to be free is so deeply baked into the culture that it’s going to take great effort to get people used to the idea of paying. I think that the widespread mockery of the New York Times
experiment was a major failure by the industry to think long-term. Sure, it was a failed experiment, and there’s nothing wrong with saying so. But the deep mockery of the very idea of a paywall helped contribute to a precedent that is still alive today. I clicked on a Haaretz link yesterday and was deeply annoyed to find that it was paywalled. It took me a little bit to realize that, when I get angered by the idea of a newspaper asking me to pay for its content, I’m part of the problem.
The sad fact is that there may just be too many mouths to feed, right now, and not enough money to go around. But even so, I don’t know how you solve this problem on the supply side. People are either going to be willing to pay for what they read or they aren’t.
I don’t want to sound too pessimistic. There’s lots of great stuff getting written out there. And I’m hoping that a combination of various models and formats can sustain the industry moving forward. Paid, niche-audience newsletters like , the patronage model of Pierre Omidyar and , porous paywalls and gated content like at The New York Times, and hybrid models like this very website– these can all work alongside sites paid for by advertising. There are some great new independent publications out there, like Jacobin Magazine or Rachel Rosenfelt’s The New Inquiry, although I have no idea if they are self-sustaining or close to it. I’ve come to a point where I recognize that universal condemnations of clickbait content simply aren’t fair, if I want to continue to enjoy lots of free stuff to read online. The question becomes what the clickbait is subsidizing, and who, and what the percentages are. Under the steady leadership of Max Read, I think Gawker has done a good job with achieving that kind of balance, for one example, but it’s always going to be a negotiation, and a struggle. And while I admire what Andrew has built here, this is a model that simply can’t be replicated by most people. It’s a functioning, self-sustaining website, but it isn’t a model or a plan.
We’ll have to see where this all goes next. For myself, I am merely trying to be more understanding and less quick to judge, while remaining adamantly opposed to PR and advertising masked as journalism. I used to mock people who spent their lives writing the same “Top Ten Dumbest Things Said on Faux News This Week” piece over and over again, but I don’t anymore. I don’t bring my online life into my day-to- I think a majority of my classmates and professors have no idea I write online. But I still get undergrads who seek me out on campus, who come to me looking for advice on how to break into online writing as a profession. I never
know what to tell them. I have always written from the position of privilege of not needing to write to live. Sometimes I give them advice,
sometimes I put them in touch with editors I’m friendly with. But for their basic questions about how to make it, I don’t really know how to respond. It’s a tough business, and an essential one, and I genuinely don’t know if it’s going to survive.
(And for Christ’s sakes, if you like a site, whitelist it on your AdBlock, OK?)
KEEPER ITEMS
Select Month
June 2015 &(1)
February 2015 &(101)
January 2015 &(656)
December 2014 &(705)
November 2014 &(781)
October 2014 &(847)
September 2014 &(868)
August 2014 &(904)
July 2014 &(936)
June 2014 &(908)
May 2014 &(915)
April 2014 &(911)
March 2014 &(905)
February 2014 &(837)
January 2014 &(932)
December 2013 &(773)
November 2013 &(831)
October 2013 &(987)
September 2013 &(922)
August 2013 &(947)
July 2013 &(1020)
June 2013 &(990)
May 2013 &(1035)
April 2013 &(982)
March 2013 &(993)
February 2013 &(913)
January 2013 &(1009)
December 2012 &(889)
November 2012 &(982)
October 2012 &(1090)
September 2012 &(1019)
August 2012 &(1069)
July 2012 &(1040)
June 2012 &(1112)
May 2012 &(1222)
April 2012 &(1065)
March 2012 &(1167)
February 2012 &(1063)
January 2012 &(1243)
December 2011 &(1105)
November 2011 &(1151)
October 2011 &(1213)
September 2011 &(1156)
August 2011 &(1259)
July 2011 &(1152)
June 2011 &(1210)
May 2011 &(1249)
April 2011 &(1196)
March 2011 &(1513)
February 2011 &(1225)
January 2011 &(1415)
December 2010 &(1217)
November 2010 &(1320)
October 2010 &(1239)
September 2010 &(1112)
August 2010 &(1172)
July 2010 &(1119)
June 2010 &(1152)
May 2010 &(1095)
April 2010 &(1117)
March 2010 &(1173)
February 2010 &(1073)
January 2010 &(1291)
December 2009 &(1151)
November 2009 &(1062)
October 2009 &(1222)
September 2009 &(1061)
August 2009 &(1060)
July 2009 &(1252)
June 2009 &(1715)
May 2009 &(1244)
April 2009 &(1277)
March 2009 &(1351)
February 2009 &(1031)
January 2009 &(999)
December 2008 &(817)
November 2008 &(1222)
October 2008 &(1650)
September 2008 &(1255)
August 2008 &(1227)
July 2008 &(1163)
June 2008 &(1276)
May 2008 &(1401)
April 2008 &(1093)
March 2008 &(1051)
February 2008 &(1003)
January 2008 &(1579)
December 2007 &(1027)
November 2007 &(947)
October 2007 &(949)
September 2007 &(765)
August 2007 &(577)
July 2007 &(886)
June 2007 &(857)
May 2007 &(867)
April 2007 &(746)
March 2007 &(841)
February 2007 &(615)
January 2007 &(504)
December 2006 &(430)
November 2006 &(565)
October 2006 &(566)
September 2006 &(434)
August 2006 &(365)
July 2006 &(353)
June 2006 &(386)
May 2006 &(599)
April 2006 &(274)
March 2006 &(376)
February 2006 &(433)
January 2006 &(335)
December 2005 &(183)
November 2005 &(222)
October 2005 &(322)
September 2005 &(341)
August 2005 &(142)
July 2005 &(265)
June 2005 &(191)
May 2005 &(132)
April 2005 &(72)
March 2005 &(47)
February 2005 &(53)
January 2005 &(153)
December 2004 &(176)
November 2004 &(193)
October 2004 &(240)
September 2004 &(187)
August 2004 &(19)
July 2004 &(192)
June 2004 &(161)
May 2004 &(134)
April 2004 &(94)
March 2004 &(94)
February 2004 &(167)
January 2004 &(121)
December 2003 &(138)
November 2003 &(166)
October 2003 &(205)
September 2003 &(145)
August 2003 &(16)
July 2003 &(130)
June 2003 &(130)
May 2003 &(130)
April 2003 &(116)
March 2003 &(186)
February 2003 &(137)
January 2003 &(107)
December 2002 &(64)
November 2002 &(60)
October 2002 &(86)
September 2002 &(73)
August 2002 &(15)
July 2002 &(60)
June 2002 &(29)
May 2002 &(57)
April 2002 &(55)
March 2002 &(70)
February 2002 &(101)
January 2002 &(102)
December 2001 &(75)
November 2001 &(79)
October 2001 &(64)
September 2001 &(51)
August 2001 &(59)
July 2001 &(55)
June 2001 &(43)
May 2001 &(56)
April 2001 &(71)
March 2001 &(77)
February 2001 &(69)
January 2001 &(106)
Send to Email Address
Your Email Address
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.