这是什么？_百度知道小木虫 --- 500万硕博科研人员喜爱的学术科研平台
&&查看话题
这是什么意思？还有没有戏？
Ref.:&&Ms. No. WSPC-JAD-D-14-00005
Non-equilibrium thermodynamic theory of ferroelectric phase transitions
Journal of
Thanks for your submission to the Journal of
The manuscript entitled &Non-equilibrium thermodynamic theory of ferroelectric phase transitions& has been reviewed and the review comments are appended below. You will see that they are advising against publication of your work, therefore I couldn't recommend it for publication. If you dissent, please submit a rebuttal against each point or resubmit your work, we will reconsider our decision. :rol:
Thank you for giving us the opportunity to consider your work. I hope the outcome of this evaluation will not discourage you from the future contributions to this journal.
Yours sincerely
Managing Editor
Journal of
Reviewers' comments:
Reviewer #1: The manuscript is very strange. It consists of two parts and to describe what the first part is about let us read the Abstract: &First, the limitations of the classical thermodynamic theory of ferroelectric phase transition (known as the Landau-Devonshire theory) were reviewed critically. The unpleasant consequence caused by the metastable states hypothesis, and evidence for the non-existence of metastable states, i.e. the logical conflict?& This is quite enough to stop and to begin to ask questions.& &Begin with the &metastable states hypothesis&. If the authors consider existence of these states as a hypothesis I see no point to address to Landau and Devonshire. It would be logical to start with the van der Waals Thesis (1873), well before both Landau and Devonshire were born. One should be more serious when &reviewing critically& scientific concepts generally accepted during at least 150 years (I am not sure that van der Waals was the first). An experimental observation that so many people (millions without exaggeration) during so long time considered metastable states as reality and not as a hypothesis is also worth explanation, isn't it?&&The more that the &evidence for the non-existence of metastable states& is so simple according to the authors (p.3): if the&&&Gibbs energy& should be minimum the metastable states are excluded. How this is compatible with Fig.1, where this &Gibbs& energy has several minima is beyond my understanding.&&Apart from this it is just fantastic that according to the authors it was 150 years of massive blindness because such a trivial argument was overlooked.&&
It makes no sense to discuss the second part of the manuscript. It is accepted in a healthy scientific society that a new theory replacing an old one is discussed only after it is shown where and why the old theory was wrong or not sufficient. This is not the case of the present manuscript and it is pointless to discuss its second part. Therefor, I could not recommend its publishing.
Reviewer #2: Presented paper pretends to give a rather severe criticism of the well established concepts in Landay theory of the first order phase transitions. However, since the very beginning of the paper, arguments are not well formulated and visibly suggest that authors somehow lacks the common understanding to Landau theory. For example, authors try to demonstrate inconsistencies in calculations of&&stable/equilibrium state, but they do not really provide reader with precise assumptions and definitions of these terms, it requires a lots of imagination to guess what issues they actually have in mind.
Anyway, it is well known that phase coexistence near first order phase transition in solids is often realized by motion of interphase boundaries. This knowledge does not disqualify the concepts of the simplified single-phase Landau theory as given in textbooks, rather, the understanding of the real processes of first-order phase transition usually starts from estimation and the minimalization of the Laundau potential like in the equation (4), and simplest texbook analysis already does give an estimation thermodynamically possible (maximum, in a sense) range of the thermal hystheresis.
Therefore, this paper would make more confusion then benefit. I cannot recommend its publication.
Reviewer #3:&&This article is interesting and may be published after some changes. The main contents of the article are connected with application of non-equilibrium thermodynamics to area of a temperature hysteresis upon the ferroelectrics phase transitions of the first order. In this area the ferroelectric crystal is in the heterophase state which stability is defined by many factors. In this article the theory allow connecting among themselves action of various factors on a condition of a crystal is offered. Such theory certainly can be useful at creation in the ferroelectric crystals of handmade domain structure. Shortcomings are carelessly written Introduction and the Conclusion. Not clearly why in Introduction Landau-Devonshire theory is discussed. Whereas it is well known that this theory considers of phase transition of the first order as occurring instantly and is therefore inapplicable for the description of the physical phenomena observed in the area of heterophase state which actually and considers in the article. In the Conclusion it would be desirable to see more certain conclusions about possibility of application of the theory stated in article for an experiment explanation
研究生必备与500万研究生在线互动！
扫描下载送金币
浏览器进程
登录小木虫
打开微信扫一扫
随时随地聊科研后使用快捷导航没有帐号？
查看: 2535|回复: 20
这是什么柏木呢？
1、时间：大年初七；
2、地点：上海郊区一个废弃厂房；
3、工具：手工锯；
4、描述：据门卫师傅讲是棵柏树，树桩高度也就40公分高，初看还可以，谁知道锯开后很多已经腐烂了，哎。可惜啊。芯材有点发红，锯时有点香味。猜测这个树桩最少存在有10年了吧，否则柏木也不会腐烂的如此严重。
本帖最后由 佘山小龙 于
10:20 编辑
锯开后的样子，只有心部还可以利用。
file:///C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator\Application Data\Tencent\Users\\QQ\WinTemp\RichOle\{S5KKX%WB4LS$2VSPQ]F4QG.png
(863.14 KB, 下载次数: 9)
10:17 上传
(829.38 KB, 下载次数: 9)
10:20 上传
整个树桩，估计觉得木头太硬，没有人弄走吧
(829.38 KB, 下载次数: 9)
10:18 上传
柏树外面腐烂的太厉害了，
(486.55 KB, 下载次数: 9)
10:21 上传
可以肯定的说！不是柏木！但是具体什么木料不太清楚
可以肯定的说！不是柏木！但是具体什么木料不太清楚
谢谢。那是什么？罗汉松？不过比罗汉松的木头要硬。网上搜了一下，说陈化的柏木芯材也会红色的
确定是柏木吗
来来来，专家给你说说。要说这柏木我是明白的。是肯定是柏木，龙柏，红心柏，香柏木都是指的它。另外我要告诉你2点你没意识到的问题，1是烂掉的是没有用的白皮，剩下的是树心，树心含油耐腐，味道香密度高，可以做佛珠雕刻都可以。2是土层下面还有许多木头，这种树是根系不发达的种类，适合深埋，所以树下至少还有半米长度，而且越往根部，油性越高。怎么样，去接着挖吧。
来来来，专家给你说说。要说这柏木我是明白的。是肯定是柏木，龙柏，红心柏，香柏木都是指的它。另外我要告 ...
谢谢了。另外我锯割时还特地摇了摇地下的部分，感觉不是很深啊，最多也就30公分的样子啊，以后再说吧，反正放在那里三五年没有人去弄的，顺便把外皮腐烂掉，哈哈
谢谢，我上百度查一下&
这是香红柏木
谢谢，我上百度查一下&
香红柏木外面的白皮厚度是要有3公分左右&
谢谢，我点开那个链接了。我这个外面的白皮厚度有3--4公分吧，全部都腐烂掉了。&
谢谢，我点开那个链接了。我这个外面的白皮厚度有3--4公分吧，全部都腐烂掉了。&
谢谢木友，&
肯定是红心香柏木，腐朽的部分是边材，中心的红的部分几十年都不会烂，因为含油脂。这种树属浅根性的，无明显主根，可将整个树蔸挖出。可作摆件，也可作香薫料……
谢谢木友，树根等再过几年去挖，呵呵&
必须有一样
不以此谋生的工作
京公网安备
Copyright &
北京木之友文化有限责任公司 All Rights Reserved.您现在的位置：>>
>>正文内容
这是什么意思？　[大智慧]
咨询详情：
&收费的、 用的是 365V13207 版本，今天早上开始显示下图，关掉没几分又出来了啦，很烦。只看看K线，10档行情，不要那些烦人的功能，更不想升级，怎么办？附件上传不了，提示内容如下：tips您多次下载升级包失败，请重新手动安装客户端&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&& 确定
大智慧客服：
您好，由于您版本过低，有此提示，需要升级，请您打开大智慧安装目录，删除update文件夹，双击运行fxj.reg，再打开软件试，如不行，建议备份userdata，覆盖安装。有问题可以拨打021-，热线技术人员指导您操作。
大智慧技术：
&越升越垃圾，才不想升的！知道为何很多老用户放弃DZH吗，就是越来越慢，尽是些没有用的功能。基本的东西，却弄没了。。。。。
网友交流：
您好，抱歉，目前服务器端已全部升级为新的版本，如方便时，建议您试在另一个盘符下载新的版本试用。软件反映慢与软件和电脑以及网络都有关的。有问题可以拨打021-，热线技术人员指导您操作。
有思路，想编写各种指标公式，程序化交易模型，选股公式，预警公式的朋友
可联系技术人员 QQ:
&进行 有偿 编写！
【字体： 】【】【】
没有相关内容
&本月热门排行
&用户常看内容
会员登录/注册已收藏本页面
这是什么?_?
菩提根吧！
算盘珠子！
后才能发表评论
你可能喜欢的图片笑话
最受欢迎的爆笑笑话